From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d86un-0004eS-1W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 11:19:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d86um-0005TX-BY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 11:19:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 17:18:56 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20170509151856.GH5243@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <20170502155452.7033-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170502155452.7033-1-berrange@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] Improve I/O tests coverage of LUKS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Blake , Max Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org Am 02.05.2017 um 17:54 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben: > The main goal of this series is to get the I/O tests passing > 100% with LUKS when run with './check -luks'. It also adds a > few more combinations to the LUKS/dmcrypt interoperability > test. > > To make LUKS testing not quite as slow, we drop the PBKDF > iteration count down to a very small value. This doesn't > remove all overhead, as formatting the volume will always > measure PBKDF timing over a 1 second interval. It looks like patch 2 needs a rebase before it can be applied to my block branch. Kevin