qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/i386: Deprecate the machines pc-0.10 to pc-0.15
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 20:04:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170510190459.GD3941@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tw4su3iw.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>

* Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On 10.05.2017 11:08, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:48:53AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> [...]
> >> Also unless we're going to get more serious about automated testing to
> >> validate machine type compatibility between *all* previously releases,
> >> I think that 6 years / 18 releases is too long a time to have any
> >> confidence in migration compatibility between versions.
> 
> Seconded.
> 
> > Distro vendors often offer 5 - 10 years support for certain versions of
> > their Linux distros, so I think we should at least support 5 years, too.
> 
> Non sequitur.
> 
> Distro vendors put in serious work to keep versions working for 5 - 10
> years.  We can't, and we don't.  All we do is try not to break things,
> which is nice, and helps the distro vendors some, but a far cry from
> anything I'd dare call "support".
> 
> Perhaps an argument could be made that us keeping to try for at least 5
> years would help distro vendors enough to be worthwhile.  Maybe, but
> color me skeptic.

Since I'm often the one having to fix the breakages when we find they've
diverged, I would prefer us to try to keep them working upstream.
Every time something slips through upstream it's more work for me.

Dave

> >> IOW, I think you should be more aggressive in culling old machine types
> >> that this patch is...
> >
> > Actually, I like the idea of using the major release versions for
> > defining the set of removal - hoping that we will do a v3.0 next year
> > which then would support the previous two major release versions 1.x and
> > 2.x, but drops support for the 0.xx versions completely ...
> 
> I wouldn't put *that* much weight into our past version numbers.  If I
> remember correctly, there was no more to 1.0 than a feeling of "this 0.x
> thing is getting ridiculous".
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-10 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-10  6:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/i386: Deprecate the machines pc-0.10 to pc-0.15 Thomas Huth
2017-05-10  9:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-10 10:05   ` Thomas Huth
2017-05-10 10:31     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-10 14:47       ` Thomas Huth
2017-05-10 16:15         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-11  7:06           ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-11  7:21             ` Thomas Huth
2017-05-11  9:30           ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-11 15:10             ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-12  6:55               ` Thomas Huth
2017-05-10 15:37     ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-10 15:40       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-10 19:04       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-05-11  7:20         ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-10 14:51   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-10 15:04     ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-10 15:14       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-11  7:26         ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-10 15:05     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170510190459.GD3941@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).