From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8tcG-0002Xl-8n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 15:19:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8tcF-0007pq-7e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 15:19:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35242) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8tcF-0007pY-1O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 15:19:11 -0400 From: Eduardo Habkost Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 16:18:26 -0300 Message-Id: <20170511191843.13784-13-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170511191843.13784-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> References: <20170511191843.13784-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/29] virt-arm: add node-id property to CPU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov From: Igor Mammedov it will allow switching from cpu_index to property based numa mapping in follow up patches. Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Message-Id: <1494415802-227633-5-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost --- hw/arm/virt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ target/arm/cpu.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c index dfd6fd446c..653b4d76fd 100644 --- a/hw/arm/virt.c +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c @@ -1350,6 +1350,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) for (n = 0; n < possible_cpus->len; n++) { Object *cpuobj; CPUState *cs; + int node_id; if (n >= smp_cpus) { break; @@ -1362,6 +1363,20 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine) cs = CPU(cpuobj); cs->cpu_index = n; + node_id = numa_get_node_for_cpu(cs->cpu_index); + if (node_id == nb_numa_nodes) { + /* by default CPUState::numa_node was 0 if it's not set via CLI + * keep it this way for now but in future we probably should + * refuse to start up with incomplete numa mapping */ + node_id = 0; + } + if (cs->numa_node == CPU_UNSET_NUMA_NODE_ID) { + cs->numa_node = node_id; + } else { + /* CPU isn't device_add compatible yet, this shouldn't happen */ + error_setg(&error_abort, "user set node-id not implemented"); + } + if (!vms->secure) { object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, false, "has_el3", NULL); } diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c index ee1406da12..c185eb19ac 100644 --- a/target/arm/cpu.c +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c @@ -1573,6 +1573,7 @@ static Property arm_cpu_properties[] = { DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("midr", ARMCPU, midr, 0), DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("mp-affinity", ARMCPU, mp_affinity, ARM64_AFFINITY_INVALID), + DEFINE_PROP_INT32("node-id", CPUState, numa_node, CPU_UNSET_NUMA_NODE_ID), DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() }; -- 2.11.0.259.g40922b1