From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 24/29] numa: remove node_cpu bitmaps as they are no longer used
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 16:18:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170511191843.13784-25-ehabkost@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511191843.13784-1-ehabkost@redhat.com>
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Postfactum "CPU(s) present in multiple NUMA nodes" check
was the last user of node_cpu bitmaps, but it's not need
as machine_set_cpu_numa_node() does the similar check at
the time mapping is set for cpus (i.e. when -numa cpus=
is parsed) and ensures that cpu can be mapped only to
one node.
Remove duplicate check based on node_cpu bitmaps and
since the last user is gone remove node_cpu as well,
which completes internal transition from legacy bitmap
based mapping storage to possible_cpus storage.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1494415802-227633-17-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
include/sysemu/numa.h | 1 -
numa.c | 43 -------------------------------------------
2 files changed, 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/sysemu/numa.h b/include/sysemu/numa.h
index 8cb3ebc233..7ffde5b119 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/numa.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/numa.h
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ struct numa_addr_range {
struct node_info {
uint64_t node_mem;
- unsigned long *node_cpu;
struct HostMemoryBackend *node_memdev;
bool present;
QLIST_HEAD(, numa_addr_range) addr; /* List to store address ranges */
diff --git a/numa.c b/numa.c
index 63bff5a54d..ca122ccb13 100644
--- a/numa.c
+++ b/numa.c
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ static void parse_numa_node(MachineState *ms, NumaNodeOptions *node,
cpus->value, max_cpus);
return;
}
- bitmap_set(numa_info[nodenr].node_cpu, cpus->value, 1);
props = mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props(ms, cpus->value);
props.node_id = nodenr;
props.has_node_id = true;
@@ -305,41 +304,6 @@ end:
return 0;
}
-static char *enumerate_cpus(unsigned long *cpus, int max_cpus)
-{
- int cpu;
- bool first = true;
- GString *s = g_string_new(NULL);
-
- for (cpu = find_first_bit(cpus, max_cpus);
- cpu < max_cpus;
- cpu = find_next_bit(cpus, max_cpus, cpu + 1)) {
- g_string_append_printf(s, "%s%d", first ? "" : " ", cpu);
- first = false;
- }
- return g_string_free(s, FALSE);
-}
-
-static void validate_numa_cpus(void)
-{
- int i;
- unsigned long *seen_cpus = bitmap_new(max_cpus);
-
- for (i = 0; i < nb_numa_nodes; i++) {
- if (bitmap_intersects(seen_cpus, numa_info[i].node_cpu, max_cpus)) {
- bitmap_and(seen_cpus, seen_cpus,
- numa_info[i].node_cpu, max_cpus);
- error_report("CPU(s) present in multiple NUMA nodes: %s",
- enumerate_cpus(seen_cpus, max_cpus));
- g_free(seen_cpus);
- exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
- }
- bitmap_or(seen_cpus, seen_cpus,
- numa_info[i].node_cpu, max_cpus);
- }
- g_free(seen_cpus);
-}
-
/* If all node pair distances are symmetric, then only distances
* in one direction are enough. If there is even one asymmetric
* pair, though, then all distances must be provided. The
@@ -451,10 +415,6 @@ void parse_numa_opts(MachineState *ms)
const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_NODES; i++) {
- numa_info[i].node_cpu = bitmap_new(max_cpus);
- }
-
if (qemu_opts_foreach(qemu_find_opts("numa"), parse_numa, ms, NULL)) {
exit(1);
}
@@ -531,13 +491,10 @@ void parse_numa_opts(MachineState *ms)
props = mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props(ms, i);
props.has_node_id = true;
- set_bit(i, numa_info[props.node_id].node_cpu);
machine_set_cpu_numa_node(ms, &props, &error_fatal);
}
}
- validate_numa_cpus();
-
/* QEMU needs at least all unique node pair distances to build
* the whole NUMA distance table. QEMU treats the distance table
* as symmetric by default, i.e. distance A->B == distance B->A.
--
2.11.0.259.g40922b1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 19:18 [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/29] x86 and machine queue, 2017-05-11 Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 01/29] i386: rewrite way CPUID index is validated Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 02/29] numa: Allow setting NUMA distance for different NUMA nodes Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-30 10:45 ` Peter Maydell
2017-05-30 14:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-30 15:28 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-30 18:10 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-30 18:21 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-30 17:08 ` Peter Maydell
2017-05-30 17:12 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/29] numa: equally distribute memory on nodes Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 04/29] tests: acpi: extend cphp and memhp testcase with numa distance check Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 05/29] tests: add CPUs to numa node mapping test Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 06/29] hw/arm/virt: extract mp-affinity calculation in separate function Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 07/29] hw/arm/virt: use machine->possible_cpus for storing possible topology info Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 08/29] hw/arm/virt: explicitly allocate cpu_index for cpus Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 09/29] numa: move source of default CPUs to NUMA node mapping into boards Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 10/29] spapr: add node-id property to sPAPR core Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 11/29] pc: add node-id property to CPU Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/29] virt-arm: " Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 13/29] numa: add check that board supports cpu_index to node mapping Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 14/29] numa: mirror cpu to node mapping in MachineState::possible_cpus Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 15/29] numa: do default mapping based on possible_cpus instead of node_cpu bitmaps Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 16/29] pc: get numa node mapping from possible_cpus instead of numa_get_node_for_cpu() Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 17/29] spapr: " Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 18/29] virt-arm: " Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 19/29] QMP: include CpuInstanceProperties into query_cpus output output Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 20/29] tests: numa: add case for QMP command query-cpus Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 21/29] numa: remove no longer need numa_post_machine_init() Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 22/29] machine: call machine init from wrapper Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 23/29] numa: use possible_cpus for not mapped CPUs check Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-17 8:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-17 9:09 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-05-11 19:18 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 25/29] numa: add '-numa cpu, ...' option for property based node mapping Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 26/29] tests: check -numa node, cpu=props_list usecase Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 27/29] migration/i386: Remove old non-softfloat 64bit FP support Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 28/29] vmstatification: i386 FPReg Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-11 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 29/29] migration/i386: Remove support for pre-0.12 formats Eduardo Habkost
2017-05-15 13:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/29] x86 and machine queue, 2017-05-11 Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170511191843.13784-25-ehabkost@redhat.com \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).