From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAFg0-000766-SL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 09:04:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAFfw-0007gg-PX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 09:04:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAFfw-0007fV-Ik for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 09:04:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:04:33 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20170515160256-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1494443192-17177-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20170515125840.GC1201@stefanha-x1.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170515125840.GC1201@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/9] pci, virtio, vhost: fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:58:40PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:07:58PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > The following changes since commit 76d20ea0f1b26ebd5da2f5fb2fdf3250cde887bb: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'armbru/tags/pull-qapi-2017-05-04-v3' into staging (2017-05-09 15:49:14 -0400) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git tags/for_upstream > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 8b12e48950a3d59188489b2ff6c5ad9cc09e9866: > > > > acpi-defs: clean up open brace usage (2017-05-10 22:04:23 +0300) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > pci, virtio, vhost: fixes > > > > A bunch of fixes that missed the release. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > Please resend with the checkpatch.pl issue fixed. There's no issue - new patch followed surrounding code which was not refactored to match checkpatch. Last patch of the series refactors all of that file to match. We do not need to worry abut bisect for checkpatch issues IMHO. -- MST