From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sockets: ensure we can bind to both ipv4 & ipv6 separately
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:39:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170516123951.GB16341@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170428121553.22408-1-berrange@redhat.com>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 01:15:53PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> When binding to an IPv6 socket we currently force the
> IPV6_V6ONLY flag to off. This means that the IPv6 socket
> will accept both IPv4 & IPv6 sockets when QEMU is launched
> with something like
>
> -vnc :::1
>
> While this is good for that case, it is bad for other
> cases. For example if an empty hostname is given,
> getaddrinfo resolves it to 2 addresses 0.0.0.0 and ::,
> in that order. We will thus bind to 0.0.0.0 first, and
> then fail to bind to :: on the same port. The same
> problem can happen if any other hostname lookup causes
> the IPv4 address to be reported before the IPv6 address.
>
> When we get an IPv6 bind failure, we should re-try the
> same port, but with IPV6_V6ONLY turned on again, to
> avoid clash with any IPv4 listener.
>
> This ensures that
>
> -vnc :1
>
> will bind successfully to both 0.0.0.0 and ::, and also
> avoid
>
> -vnc :1,to=2
>
> from mistakenly using a 2nd port for the :: listener.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
> util/qemu-sockets.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Ping Paolo or Gerd - any comments on this patch ?
Separately from this patch, I noticed one further possible
problem,
Currently, the ipv4=on|off/ipv6=on|off settings are only
used to determine what getaddrinfo results we request/use.
This leads to the somewhat odd situation where if you set
ipv4=off,ipv6=on, QEMU won't be listening on an IPv4
socket, but *will still* accept IPv4 clients over the IPv6
socket due to our use of IPV6_V6ONLY=off.
So I'm thinking that when ipv4=off, we should in fact
set IPV6_V6ONLY=on. My fear though is that this is a
semantic change that could cause regression. ie someone
might be accidentally relying on fact that ipv4=off,ipv6=on
still lets IPv4 clients connection, despite it being a
somewhat nonsensical scenario
>
> diff --git a/util/qemu-sockets.c b/util/qemu-sockets.c
> index 8188d9a..75d1e0f 100644
> --- a/util/qemu-sockets.c
> +++ b/util/qemu-sockets.c
> @@ -207,22 +207,36 @@ static int inet_listen_saddr(InetSocketAddress *saddr,
> }
>
> socket_set_fast_reuse(slisten);
> -#ifdef IPV6_V6ONLY
> - if (e->ai_family == PF_INET6) {
> - /* listen on both ipv4 and ipv6 */
> - const int off = 0;
> - qemu_setsockopt(slisten, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &off,
> - sizeof(off));
> - }
> -#endif
>
> port_min = inet_getport(e);
> port_max = saddr->has_to ? saddr->to + port_offset : port_min;
> for (p = port_min; p <= port_max; p++) {
> inet_setport(e, p);
> +#ifdef IPV6_V6ONLY
> + if (e->ai_family == PF_INET6) {
> + /* listen on both ipv4 and ipv6 */
> + const int off = 0;
> + qemu_setsockopt(slisten, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &off,
> + sizeof(off));
> + }
> +#endif
> if (bind(slisten, e->ai_addr, e->ai_addrlen) == 0) {
> goto listen;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef IPV6_V6ONLY
> + if (e->ai_family == PF_INET6 && errno == EADDRINUSE) {
> + /* listen on only ipv6 */
> + const int on = 1;
> + qemu_setsockopt(slisten, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY, &on,
> + sizeof(on));
> +
> + if (bind(slisten, e->ai_addr, e->ai_addrlen) == 0) {
> + goto listen;
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> if (p == port_max) {
> if (!e->ai_next) {
> error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Failed to bind socket");
> --
> 2.9.3
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-28 12:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sockets: ensure we can bind to both ipv4 & ipv6 separately Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-28 14:57 ` Eric Blake
2017-04-28 14:59 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-04-28 15:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-16 12:39 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2017-05-16 13:29 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-05-16 13:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-05-16 13:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170516123951.GB16341@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).