From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: jsnow@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/12] dirty-bitmap: Set iterator start by offset, not sector
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 15:47:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170516204724.1617-6-eblake@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170516204724.1617-1-eblake@redhat.com>
All callers to bdrv_dirty_iter_new() passed 0 for their initial
starting point, drop that parameter.
All callers to bdrv_set_dirty_iter() were scaling an offset to
a sector number; move the scaling to occur internally to dirty
bitmap code instead.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
v2: no change
---
include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 5 ++---
block/backup.c | 5 ++---
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 9 ++++-----
block/mirror.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
index a83979d..efcec60 100644
--- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
+++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
@@ -41,11 +41,10 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
void bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
int64_t cur_sector, int64_t nr_sectors);
BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_meta_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
-BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
- uint64_t first_sector);
+BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
void bdrv_dirty_iter_free(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter);
int64_t bdrv_dirty_iter_next(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter);
-void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t sector_num);
+void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *hbi, int64_t offset);
int64_t bdrv_get_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
int64_t bdrv_get_meta_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap);
void bdrv_dirty_bitmap_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs);
diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
index b8b76e5..70126b8 100644
--- a/block/backup.c
+++ b/block/backup.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
granularity = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(job->sync_bitmap);
clusters_per_iter = MAX((granularity / job->cluster_size), 1);
- dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(job->sync_bitmap, 0);
+ dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(job->sync_bitmap);
/* Find the next dirty sector(s) */
while ((offset = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(dbi) * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) >= 0) {
@@ -403,8 +403,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn backup_run_incremental(BackupBlockJob *job)
/* If the bitmap granularity is smaller than the backup granularity,
* we need to advance the iterator pointer to the next cluster. */
if (granularity < job->cluster_size) {
- bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi,
- cluster * job->cluster_size / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
+ bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, cluster * job->cluster_size);
}
last_cluster = cluster - 1;
diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
index a413df1..3fb4871 100644
--- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -367,11 +367,10 @@ uint32_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
return BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE << hbitmap_granularity(bitmap->bitmap);
}
-BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
- uint64_t first_sector)
+BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *bdrv_dirty_iter_new(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
{
BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter = g_new(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter, 1);
- hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, bitmap->bitmap, first_sector);
+ hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, bitmap->bitmap, 0);
iter->bitmap = bitmap;
bitmap->active_iterators++;
return iter;
@@ -488,9 +487,9 @@ void bdrv_set_dirty(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t cur_sector,
/**
* Advance a BdrvDirtyBitmapIter to an arbitrary offset.
*/
-void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter, int64_t sector_num)
+void bdrv_set_dirty_iter(BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *iter, int64_t offset)
{
- hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, iter->hbi.hb, sector_num);
+ hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, iter->hbi.hb, offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
}
int64_t bdrv_get_dirty_count(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap)
diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c
index 452d546..885cc29 100644
--- a/block/mirror.c
+++ b/block/mirror.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s)
next_dirty = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi) * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
if (next_dirty > next_offset || next_dirty < 0) {
/* The bitmap iterator's cache is stale, refresh it */
- bdrv_set_dirty_iter(s->dbi, next_offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);
+ bdrv_set_dirty_iter(s->dbi, next_offset);
next_dirty = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(s->dbi) * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
}
assert(next_dirty == next_offset);
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn mirror_run(void *opaque)
}
assert(!s->dbi);
- s->dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(s->dirty_bitmap, 0);
+ s->dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(s->dirty_bitmap);
for (;;) {
uint64_t delay_ns = 0;
int64_t cnt, delta;
--
2.9.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-16 20:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/12] make dirty-bitmap byte-based Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/12] dirty-bitmap: Report BlockDirtyInfo.count in bytes, as documented Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/12] migration: Don't lose errno across aio context changes Eric Blake
2017-06-27 3:15 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/12] dirty-bitmap: Drop unused functions Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 04/12] dirty-bitmap: Track size in bytes Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 06/12] dirty-bitmap: Change bdrv_dirty_iter_next() to report byte offset Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/12] dirty-bitmap: Change bdrv_get_dirty_count() to report bytes Eric Blake
2017-05-17 11:34 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 08/12] dirty-bitmap: Change bdrv_get_dirty() to take bytes Eric Blake
2017-05-17 11:37 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/12] dirty-bitmap: Change bdrv_[re]set_dirty_bitmap() to use bytes Eric Blake
2017-05-17 11:59 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-17 13:40 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/12] mirror: Switch mirror_dirty_init() to byte-based iteration Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 11/12] dirty-bitmap: Switch bdrv_set_dirty() to bytes Eric Blake
2017-05-16 20:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/12] dirty-bitmap: Convert internal hbitmap size/granularity Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170516204724.1617-6-eblake@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).