[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] block: fix 'savevm' hang with -object iothread

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] block: fix 'savevm' hang with -object iothread

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

The 'savevm' command hangs when -object iothread is used.  See patches for
details, but basically the vmstate read/write code didn't conform to the latest
block layer locking rules.

Stefan Hajnoczi (3):
  block: count bdrv_co_rw_vmstate() requests
  block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()
  migration: avoid recursive AioContext locking in save_vmstate()

 block/io.c         | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 migration/savevm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.3

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: count bdrv_co_rw_vmstate() requests

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

Call bdrv_inc/dec_in_flight() for vmstate reads/writes.  This seems
unnecessary at first glance because vmstate reads/writes are done
synchronously while the guest is stopped.  But we need the bdrv_wakeup()
in bdrv_dec_in_flight() so the main loop sees request completion.
Besides, it's cleaner to count vmstate reads/writes like ordinary
read/write requests.

The bdrv_wakeup() partially fixes a 'savevm' hang with -object iothread.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 block/io.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index fdd7485..cc56e90 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -1988,17 +1988,24 @@ bdrv_co_rw_vmstate(BlockDriverState *bs, QEMUIOVector *qiov, int64_t pos,
                    bool is_read)
 {
     BlockDriver *drv = bs->drv;
+    int ret = -ENOTSUP;
+
+    bdrv_inc_in_flight(bs);
 
     if (!drv) {
-        return -ENOMEDIUM;
+        ret = -ENOMEDIUM;
     } else if (drv->bdrv_load_vmstate) {
-        return is_read ? drv->bdrv_load_vmstate(bs, qiov, pos)
-                       : drv->bdrv_save_vmstate(bs, qiov, pos);
+        if (is_read) {
+            ret = drv->bdrv_load_vmstate(bs, qiov, pos);
+        } else {
+            ret = drv->bdrv_save_vmstate(bs, qiov, pos);
+        }
     } else if (bs->file) {
-        return bdrv_co_rw_vmstate(bs->file->bs, qiov, pos, is_read);
+        ret = bdrv_co_rw_vmstate(bs->file->bs, qiov, pos, is_read);
     }
 
-    return -ENOTSUP;
+    bdrv_dec_in_flight(bs);
+    return ret;
 }
 
 static void coroutine_fn bdrv_co_rw_vmstate_entry(void *opaque)
-- 
2.9.3

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: count bdrv_co_rw_vmstate() requests

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 843 bytes --]

On 05/17/2017 12:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Call bdrv_inc/dec_in_flight() for vmstate reads/writes.  This seems
> unnecessary at first glance because vmstate reads/writes are done
> synchronously while the guest is stopped.  But we need the bdrv_wakeup()
> in bdrv_dec_in_flight() so the main loop sees request completion.
> Besides, it's cleaner to count vmstate reads/writes like ordinary
> read/write requests.
> 
> The bdrv_wakeup() partially fixes a 'savevm' hang with -object iothread.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/io.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

Calling aio_poll() directly may have been fine previously, but this is
the future, man!  The difference between an aio_poll() loop and
BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is that BDRV_POLL_WHILE() releases the AioContext
around aio_poll().

This allows the IOThread to run fd handlers or BHs to complete the
request.  Failure to release the AioContext causes deadlocks.

Using BDRV_POLL_WHILE() partially fixes a 'savevm' hang with -object
iothread.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 block/io.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index cc56e90..f0041cd 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -2031,9 +2031,7 @@ bdrv_rw_vmstate(BlockDriverState *bs, QEMUIOVector *qiov, int64_t pos,
         Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_co_rw_vmstate_entry, &data);
 
         bdrv_coroutine_enter(bs, co);
-        while (data.ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
-            aio_poll(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), true);
-        }
+        BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, data.ret == -EINPROGRESS);
         return data.ret;
     }
 }
-- 
2.9.3

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1733 bytes --]

On 05/17/2017 12:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Calling aio_poll() directly may have been fine previously, but this is
> the future, man!

lol

>  The difference between an aio_poll() loop and
> BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is that BDRV_POLL_WHILE() releases the AioContext
> around aio_poll().
> 
> This allows the IOThread to run fd handlers or BHs to complete the
> request.  Failure to release the AioContext causes deadlocks.
> 
> Using BDRV_POLL_WHILE() partially fixes a 'savevm' hang with -object
> iothread.

I'm surprised at how many separate hangs we actually had!

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/io.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

> 
> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> index cc56e90..f0041cd 100644
> --- a/block/io.c
> +++ b/block/io.c
> @@ -2031,9 +2031,7 @@ bdrv_rw_vmstate(BlockDriverState *bs, QEMUIOVector *qiov, int64_t pos,
>          Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_co_rw_vmstate_entry, &data);
>  
>          bdrv_coroutine_enter(bs, co);
> -        while (data.ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
> -            aio_poll(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), true);
> -        }
> +        BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, data.ret == -EINPROGRESS);
>          return data.ret;
>      }

Do we have other culprits (not necessarily for vmsave, but for other
situations), where we should be using BDRV_POLL_WHILE in separate
patches? For example, a quick grep show that at least hw/9pfs/9p.c makes
a direct call to aio_poll(,true) in a while loop.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()

[Paolo Bonzini]

> I'm surprised at how many separate hangs we actually had!

Note that I have seen quite a few before, though I am not sure about
the details and the reproducibility.  The release/acquire was hidden
behind RFifoLock contention callbacks instead of BDRV_POLL_WHILE.

Paolo

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  block/io.c | 4 +---
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
> > index cc56e90..f0041cd 100644
> > --- a/block/io.c
> > +++ b/block/io.c
> > @@ -2031,9 +2031,7 @@ bdrv_rw_vmstate(BlockDriverState *bs, QEMUIOVector
> > *qiov, int64_t pos,
> >          Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_co_rw_vmstate_entry,
> >          &data);
> >  
> >          bdrv_coroutine_enter(bs, co);
> > -        while (data.ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
> > -            aio_poll(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), true);
> > -        }
> > +        BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, data.ret == -EINPROGRESS);
> >          return data.ret;
> >      }
> 
> Do we have other culprits (not necessarily for vmsave, but for other
> situations), where we should be using BDRV_POLL_WHILE in separate
> patches? For example, a quick grep show that at least hw/9pfs/9p.c makes
> a direct call to aio_poll(,true) in a while loop.
> 
> --
> Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
> Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org
> 
> 

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()

[Kevin Wolf]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 789 bytes --]

Am 17.05.2017 um 22:16 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 05/17/2017 12:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Calling aio_poll() directly may have been fine previously, but this is
> > the future, man!
> 
> lol
> 
> >  The difference between an aio_poll() loop and
> > BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is that BDRV_POLL_WHILE() releases the AioContext
> > around aio_poll().
> > 
> > This allows the IOThread to run fd handlers or BHs to complete the
> > request.  Failure to release the AioContext causes deadlocks.
> > 
> > Using BDRV_POLL_WHILE() partially fixes a 'savevm' hang with -object
> > iothread.
> 
> I'm surprised at how many separate hangs we actually had!

How hard would it be to write some test cases for this? Dataplane has
a serious lack of automated testing.

Kevin

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 2/3] block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> Am 17.05.2017 um 22:16 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> On 05/17/2017 12:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > Calling aio_poll() directly may have been fine previously, but this is
>> > the future, man!
>>
>> lol
>>
>> >  The difference between an aio_poll() loop and
>> > BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is that BDRV_POLL_WHILE() releases the AioContext
>> > around aio_poll().
>> >
>> > This allows the IOThread to run fd handlers or BHs to complete the
>> > request.  Failure to release the AioContext causes deadlocks.
>> >
>> > Using BDRV_POLL_WHILE() partially fixes a 'savevm' hang with -object
>> > iothread.
>>
>> I'm surprised at how many separate hangs we actually had!
>
> How hard would it be to write some test cases for this? Dataplane has
> a serious lack of automated testing.

And this hang doesn't even require in-flight guest I/O, so it would be
easy to reproduce in qemu-iotests if we add an IOThread mode.

Stefan

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 2/3] block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 18.05.2017 um 10:06 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Am 17.05.2017 um 22:16 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> On 05/17/2017 12:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> > Calling aio_poll() directly may have been fine previously, but this is
> >> > the future, man!
> >>
> >> lol
> >>
> >> >  The difference between an aio_poll() loop and
> >> > BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is that BDRV_POLL_WHILE() releases the AioContext
> >> > around aio_poll().
> >> >
> >> > This allows the IOThread to run fd handlers or BHs to complete the
> >> > request.  Failure to release the AioContext causes deadlocks.
> >> >
> >> > Using BDRV_POLL_WHILE() partially fixes a 'savevm' hang with -object
> >> > iothread.
> >>
> >> I'm surprised at how many separate hangs we actually had!
> >
> > How hard would it be to write some test cases for this? Dataplane has
> > a serious lack of automated testing.
> 
> And this hang doesn't even require in-flight guest I/O, so it would be
> easy to reproduce in qemu-iotests if we add an IOThread mode.

I don't think I would make it a separate mode (because people would run
only one or the other - when did you last run qcow2 v2 tests?), but just
add some test cases that make use of it during the normal -qcow2 or -raw
run.

Kevin

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 2/3] block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/17/2017 12:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
>> index cc56e90..f0041cd 100644
>> --- a/block/io.c
>> +++ b/block/io.c
>> @@ -2031,9 +2031,7 @@ bdrv_rw_vmstate(BlockDriverState *bs, QEMUIOVector *qiov, int64_t pos,
>>          Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(bdrv_co_rw_vmstate_entry, &data);
>>
>>          bdrv_coroutine_enter(bs, co);
>> -        while (data.ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
>> -            aio_poll(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), true);
>> -        }
>> +        BDRV_POLL_WHILE(bs, data.ret == -EINPROGRESS);
>>          return data.ret;
>>      }
>
> Do we have other culprits (not necessarily for vmsave, but for other
> situations), where we should be using BDRV_POLL_WHILE in separate
> patches? For example, a quick grep show that at least hw/9pfs/9p.c makes
> a direct call to aio_poll(,true) in a while loop.

virtio-9p doesn't use IOThread (dataplane) so it is not affected.  It
also doesn't use BlockDriverState so it cannot use BDRV_POLL_WHILE().

I did grep for other aio_poll() callers and didn't spot any obvious
cases that need to be fixed.  They tend to run in situations where
this deadlock cannot occur.

Stefan

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] migration: avoid recursive AioContext locking in save_vmstate()

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

AioContext was designed to allow nested acquire/release calls.  It uses
a recursive mutex so callers don't need to worry about nesting...or so
we thought.

BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is used to wait for block I/O requests.  It releases
the AioContext temporarily around aio_poll().  This gives IOThreads a
chance to acquire the AioContext to process I/O completions.

It turns out that recursive locking and BDRV_POLL_WHILE() don't mix.
BDRV_POLL_WHILE() only releases the AioContext once, so the IOThread
will not be able to acquire the AioContext if it was acquired
multiple times.

Instead of trying to release AioContext n times in BDRV_POLL_WHILE(),
this patch simply avoids nested locking in save_vmstate().  It's the
simplest fix and we should step back to consider the big picture with
all the recent changes to block layer threading.

This patch is the final fix to solve 'savevm' hanging with -object
iothread.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 migration/savevm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
index 7f66d58..a70ba20 100644
--- a/migration/savevm.c
+++ b/migration/savevm.c
@@ -2153,6 +2153,14 @@ int save_vmstate(const char *name)
         goto the_end;
     }
 
+    /* The bdrv_all_create_snapshot() call that follows acquires the AioContext
+     * for itself.  BDRV_POLL_WHILE() does not support nested locking because
+     * it only releases the lock once.  Therefore synchronous I/O will deadlock
+     * unless we release the AioContext before bdrv_all_create_snapshot().
+     */
+    aio_context_release(aio_context);
+    aio_context = NULL;
+
     ret = bdrv_all_create_snapshot(sn, bs, vm_state_size, &bs);
     if (ret < 0) {
         error_report("Error while creating snapshot on '%s'",
@@ -2163,7 +2171,9 @@ int save_vmstate(const char *name)
     ret = 0;
 
  the_end:
-    aio_context_release(aio_context);
+    if (aio_context) {
+        aio_context_release(aio_context);
+    }
     if (saved_vm_running) {
         vm_start();
     }
-- 
2.9.3

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] migration: avoid recursive AioContext locking in save_vmstate()

[Eric Blake]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1363 bytes --]

On 05/17/2017 12:09 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> AioContext was designed to allow nested acquire/release calls.  It uses
> a recursive mutex so callers don't need to worry about nesting...or so
> we thought.
> 
> BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is used to wait for block I/O requests.  It releases
> the AioContext temporarily around aio_poll().  This gives IOThreads a
> chance to acquire the AioContext to process I/O completions.
> 
> It turns out that recursive locking and BDRV_POLL_WHILE() don't mix.
> BDRV_POLL_WHILE() only releases the AioContext once, so the IOThread
> will not be able to acquire the AioContext if it was acquired
> multiple times.
> 
> Instead of trying to release AioContext n times in BDRV_POLL_WHILE(),
> this patch simply avoids nested locking in save_vmstate().  It's the
> simplest fix and we should step back to consider the big picture with
> all the recent changes to block layer threading.
> 
> This patch is the final fix to solve 'savevm' hanging with -object
> iothread.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/savevm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] migration: avoid recursive AioContext locking in save_vmstate()

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 17.05.2017 um 19:09 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> AioContext was designed to allow nested acquire/release calls.  It uses
> a recursive mutex so callers don't need to worry about nesting...or so
> we thought.
> 
> BDRV_POLL_WHILE() is used to wait for block I/O requests.  It releases
> the AioContext temporarily around aio_poll().  This gives IOThreads a
> chance to acquire the AioContext to process I/O completions.
> 
> It turns out that recursive locking and BDRV_POLL_WHILE() don't mix.
> BDRV_POLL_WHILE() only releases the AioContext once, so the IOThread
> will not be able to acquire the AioContext if it was acquired
> multiple times.
> 
> Instead of trying to release AioContext n times in BDRV_POLL_WHILE(),
> this patch simply avoids nested locking in save_vmstate().  It's the
> simplest fix and we should step back to consider the big picture with
> all the recent changes to block layer threading.
> 
> This patch is the final fix to solve 'savevm' hanging with -object
> iothread.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/savevm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
> index 7f66d58..a70ba20 100644
> --- a/migration/savevm.c
> +++ b/migration/savevm.c
> @@ -2153,6 +2153,14 @@ int save_vmstate(const char *name)
>          goto the_end;
>      }
>  
> +    /* The bdrv_all_create_snapshot() call that follows acquires the AioContext
> +     * for itself.  BDRV_POLL_WHILE() does not support nested locking because
> +     * it only releases the lock once.  Therefore synchronous I/O will deadlock
> +     * unless we release the AioContext before bdrv_all_create_snapshot().
> +     */
> +    aio_context_release(aio_context);
> +    aio_context = NULL;
> +
>      ret = bdrv_all_create_snapshot(sn, bs, vm_state_size, &bs);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          error_report("Error while creating snapshot on '%s'",
> @@ -2163,7 +2171,9 @@ int save_vmstate(const char *name)
>      ret = 0;
>  
>   the_end:
> -    aio_context_release(aio_context);
> +    if (aio_context) {
> +        aio_context_release(aio_context);
> +    }
>      if (saved_vm_running) {
>          vm_start();
>      }

It might actually even be true before this patch because the lock is
already only taken for some parts of the function, but don't we need to
call bdrv_drain_all_begin/end() around the whole function now?

We're stopping the VM, so hopefully no device is continuing to process
requests, but can't we still have block jobs, NBD server requests etc.?

And the same is probably true for qemu_loadvm_state().

Kevin

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH 3/3] migration: avoid recursive AioContext locking in save_vmstate()

[Stefan Hajnoczi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1852 bytes --]

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:18:46AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 17.05.2017 um 19:09 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
> > index 7f66d58..a70ba20 100644
> > --- a/migration/savevm.c
> > +++ b/migration/savevm.c
> > @@ -2153,6 +2153,14 @@ int save_vmstate(const char *name)
> >          goto the_end;
> >      }
> >  
> > +    /* The bdrv_all_create_snapshot() call that follows acquires the AioContext
> > +     * for itself.  BDRV_POLL_WHILE() does not support nested locking because
> > +     * it only releases the lock once.  Therefore synchronous I/O will deadlock
> > +     * unless we release the AioContext before bdrv_all_create_snapshot().
> > +     */
> > +    aio_context_release(aio_context);
> > +    aio_context = NULL;
> > +
> >      ret = bdrv_all_create_snapshot(sn, bs, vm_state_size, &bs);
> >      if (ret < 0) {
> >          error_report("Error while creating snapshot on '%s'",
> > @@ -2163,7 +2171,9 @@ int save_vmstate(const char *name)
> >      ret = 0;
> >  
> >   the_end:
> > -    aio_context_release(aio_context);
> > +    if (aio_context) {
> > +        aio_context_release(aio_context);
> > +    }
> >      if (saved_vm_running) {
> >          vm_start();
> >      }
> 
> It might actually even be true before this patch because the lock is
> already only taken for some parts of the function, but don't we need to
> call bdrv_drain_all_begin/end() around the whole function now?
> 
> We're stopping the VM, so hopefully no device is continuing to process
> requests, but can't we still have block jobs, NBD server requests etc.?
> 
> And the same is probably true for qemu_loadvm_state().

Yes, they currently rely on bdrv_drain_all() but that's not enough.
Thanks for the suggestion, will add a patch in v2.

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] block: fix 'savevm' hang with -object iothread

[Paolo Bonzini]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Fam Zheng" <famz@redhat.com>, "Stefan
> Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 7:09:38 PM
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] block: fix 'savevm' hang with -object iothread
> 
> The 'savevm' command hangs when -object iothread is used.  See patches for
> details, but basically the vmstate read/write code didn't conform to the
> latest block layer locking rules.

Thanks for the fixes.

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

> Stefan Hajnoczi (3):
>   block: count bdrv_co_rw_vmstate() requests
>   block: use BDRV_POLL_WHILE() in bdrv_rw_vmstate()
>   migration: avoid recursive AioContext locking in save_vmstate()
> 
>  block/io.c         | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>  migration/savevm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.9.3
> 
> 
>