From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: abologna@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [RFC 1/2] pseries: Split CAS PVR negotiation out into a separate function
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 17:56:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170517175657.0c0f7666@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517063547.23876-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4435 bytes --]
On Wed, 17 May 2017 16:35:46 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> Guests of the qemu machine type go through a feature negotiation process
> known as "client architecture support" (CAS) during early boot. This does
> a number of things, one of which is finding a CPU compatibility mode which
> can be supported by both guest and host.
>
> In fact the CPU negotiation is probably the single most complex part of the
> CAS process, so this splits it out into a helper function. We've recently
> made some mistakes in maintaining backward compatibility for old machine
> types here. Splitting this out will also make it easier to fix this.
>
> This also adds a possibly useful error message if the negotiation fails
> (i.e. if there is CPU mode that's suitable for both guest and host).
s/if there is/if there isn't a/ ?
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> index 0d608d6..007ae8d 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> @@ -1047,19 +1047,13 @@ static target_ulong h_signal_sys_reset(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> }
> }
>
> -static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> - sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> - target_ulong opcode,
> - target_ulong *args)
> +static uint32_t cas_check_pvr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong list,
> + Error **errp)
> {
> - target_ulong list = ppc64_phys_to_real(args[0]);
> - target_ulong ov_table;
> bool explicit_match = false; /* Matched the CPU's real PVR */
> uint32_t max_compat = cpu->max_compat;
> uint32_t best_compat = 0;
> int i;
> - sPAPROptionVector *ov1_guest, *ov5_guest, *ov5_cas_old, *ov5_updates;
> - bool guest_radix;
>
> /*
> * We scan the supplied table of PVRs looking for two things
> @@ -1090,26 +1084,43 @@ static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> /* We couldn't find a suitable compatibility mode, and either
> * the guest doesn't support "raw" mode for this CPU, or raw
> * mode is disabled because a maximum compat mode is set */
> - return H_HARDWARE;
> + error_setg(errp, "Couldn't negotiate a suitable PVR during CAS");
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* Parsing finished */
> trace_spapr_cas_pvr(cpu->compat_pvr, explicit_match, best_compat);
>
> - /* Update CPUs */
> - if (cpu->compat_pvr != best_compat) {
> - Error *local_err = NULL;
> + return best_compat;
> +}
> +
> +static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> + sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + target_ulong opcode,
> + target_ulong *args)
> +{
> + /* @ov_table points to the first option vector */
> + target_ulong ov_table = ppc64_phys_to_real(args[0]);
> + uint32_t cas_pvr;
> + sPAPROptionVector *ov1_guest, *ov5_guest, *ov5_cas_old, *ov5_updates;
> + bool guest_radix;
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> - ppc_set_compat_all(best_compat, &local_err);
> + cas_pvr = cas_check_pvr(cpu, ov_table, &local_err);
Shouldn't cas_check_pvr() take a target_ulong * so that we can get
the address of the first option vector...
> + if (local_err) {
> + error_report_err(local_err);
> + return H_HARDWARE;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update CPUs */
> + if (cpu->compat_pvr != cas_pvr) {
> + ppc_set_compat_all(cas_pvr, &local_err);
> if (local_err) {
> error_report_err(local_err);
> return H_HARDWARE;
> }
> }
>
> - /* For the future use: here @ov_table points to the first option vector */
> - ov_table = list;
> -
... and address Laurent's comment ?
> ov1_guest = spapr_ovec_parse_vector(ov_table, 1);
> ov5_guest = spapr_ovec_parse_vector(ov_table, 5);
> if (spapr_ovec_test(ov5_guest, OV5_MMU_BOTH)) {
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-17 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-17 6:35 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] pseries: Correct behaviour change for older machine types David Gibson
2017-05-17 6:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] pseries: Split CAS PVR negotiation out into a separate function David Gibson
2017-05-17 8:55 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-05-17 15:56 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2017-05-18 4:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " David Gibson
2017-05-17 6:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/2] pseries: Restore PVR negotiation logic for pre-2.9 machine types David Gibson
2017-05-17 9:21 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-05-17 16:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2017-05-17 8:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] pseries: Correct behaviour change for older " Andrea Bolognani
2017-05-18 4:51 ` David Gibson
2017-05-18 6:58 ` Andrea Bolognani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170517175657.0c0f7666@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=abologna@redhat.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).