From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: abologna@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [RFC 1/2] pseries: Split CAS PVR negotiation out into a separate function
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:37:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170518043719.GS15596@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517175657.0c0f7666@bahia.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5058 bytes --]
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 05:56:57PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2017 16:35:46 +1000
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> > Guests of the qemu machine type go through a feature negotiation process
> > known as "client architecture support" (CAS) during early boot. This does
> > a number of things, one of which is finding a CPU compatibility mode which
> > can be supported by both guest and host.
> >
> > In fact the CPU negotiation is probably the single most complex part of the
> > CAS process, so this splits it out into a helper function. We've recently
> > made some mistakes in maintaining backward compatibility for old machine
> > types here. Splitting this out will also make it easier to fix this.
> >
> > This also adds a possibly useful error message if the negotiation fails
> > (i.e. if there is CPU mode that's suitable for both guest and host).
>
> s/if there is/if there isn't a/ ?
Oops, I'll correct that.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> > hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> > index 0d608d6..007ae8d 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> > @@ -1047,19 +1047,13 @@ static target_ulong h_signal_sys_reset(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > - sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > - target_ulong opcode,
> > - target_ulong *args)
> > +static uint32_t cas_check_pvr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong list,
> > + Error **errp)
> > {
> > - target_ulong list = ppc64_phys_to_real(args[0]);
> > - target_ulong ov_table;
> > bool explicit_match = false; /* Matched the CPU's real PVR */
> > uint32_t max_compat = cpu->max_compat;
> > uint32_t best_compat = 0;
> > int i;
> > - sPAPROptionVector *ov1_guest, *ov5_guest, *ov5_cas_old, *ov5_updates;
> > - bool guest_radix;
> >
> > /*
> > * We scan the supplied table of PVRs looking for two things
> > @@ -1090,26 +1084,43 @@ static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > /* We couldn't find a suitable compatibility mode, and either
> > * the guest doesn't support "raw" mode for this CPU, or raw
> > * mode is disabled because a maximum compat mode is set */
> > - return H_HARDWARE;
> > + error_setg(errp, "Couldn't negotiate a suitable PVR during CAS");
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > /* Parsing finished */
> > trace_spapr_cas_pvr(cpu->compat_pvr, explicit_match, best_compat);
> >
> > - /* Update CPUs */
> > - if (cpu->compat_pvr != best_compat) {
> > - Error *local_err = NULL;
> > + return best_compat;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > + sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > + target_ulong opcode,
> > + target_ulong *args)
> > +{
> > + /* @ov_table points to the first option vector */
> > + target_ulong ov_table = ppc64_phys_to_real(args[0]);
> > + uint32_t cas_pvr;
> > + sPAPROptionVector *ov1_guest, *ov5_guest, *ov5_cas_old, *ov5_updates;
> > + bool guest_radix;
> > + Error *local_err = NULL;
> >
> > - ppc_set_compat_all(best_compat, &local_err);
> > + cas_pvr = cas_check_pvr(cpu, ov_table, &local_err);
>
> Shouldn't cas_check_pvr() take a target_ulong * so that we can get
> the address of the first option vector...
>
> > + if (local_err) {
> > + error_report_err(local_err);
> > + return H_HARDWARE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Update CPUs */
> > + if (cpu->compat_pvr != cas_pvr) {
> > + ppc_set_compat_all(cas_pvr, &local_err);
> > if (local_err) {
> > error_report_err(local_err);
> > return H_HARDWARE;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - /* For the future use: here @ov_table points to the first option vector */
> > - ov_table = list;
> > -
>
> ... and address Laurent's comment ?
Yes, I completely misread what was happening with the pvr_list vs. the
option vectors. I'll correct that.
>
> > ov1_guest = spapr_ovec_parse_vector(ov_table, 1);
> > ov5_guest = spapr_ovec_parse_vector(ov_table, 5);
> > if (spapr_ovec_test(ov5_guest, OV5_MMU_BOTH)) {
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-18 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-17 6:35 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] pseries: Correct behaviour change for older machine types David Gibson
2017-05-17 6:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] pseries: Split CAS PVR negotiation out into a separate function David Gibson
2017-05-17 8:55 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-05-17 15:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2017-05-18 4:37 ` David Gibson [this message]
2017-05-17 6:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/2] pseries: Restore PVR negotiation logic for pre-2.9 machine types David Gibson
2017-05-17 9:21 ` Laurent Vivier
2017-05-17 16:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2017-05-17 8:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] pseries: Correct behaviour change for older " Andrea Bolognani
2017-05-18 4:51 ` David Gibson
2017-05-18 6:58 ` Andrea Bolognani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170518043719.GS15596@umbus.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=abologna@redhat.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).