Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V6 07/10] migration: add bitmap for copied page

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Peter Xu (peterx@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:28:57AM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> > On 05/25/2017 02:30 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:16:23PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> > >>On 05/24/2017 03:01 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >>>On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:56:37AM +0300, Alexey wrote:
> > >>>>On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:57:36PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >>>>>On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:31:08PM +0300, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> > >>>>>>This patch adds ability to track down already copied
> > >>>>>>pages, it's necessary for calculation vCPU block time in
> > >>>>>>postcopy migration feature and maybe for restore after
> > >>>>>>postcopy migration failure.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>Functions which work with RAMBlock are placed into ram.c,
> > >>>>>>due to TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN is poisoned int postcopy-ram.c -
> > >>>>>>hardware independed code.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
> > >>>>>>---
> > >>>>>>  include/migration/migration.h | 16 +++++++++++
> > >>>>>>  migration/postcopy-ram.c      | 22 ++++++++++++---
> > >>>>>>  migration/ram.c               | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>>>>>  3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>diff --git a/include/migration/migration.h b/include/migration/migration.h
> > >>>>>>index 449cb07..4e05c83 100644
> > >>>>>>--- a/include/migration/migration.h
> > >>>>>>+++ b/include/migration/migration.h
> > >>>>>>@@ -101,6 +101,20 @@ struct MigrationIncomingState {
> > >>>>>>      LoadStateEntry_Head loadvm_handlers;
> > >>>>>>      /*
> > >>>>>>+     * bitmap indicates whether page copied,
> > >>>>>>+     * based on ramblock offset
> > >>>>>>+     * now it is using only for blocktime calculation in
> > >>>>>>+     * postcopy migration, so livetime of this entry:
> > >>>>>>+     * since user requested blocktime calculation,
> > >>>>>>+     * till the end of postcopy migration
> > >>>>>>+     * as an example it could represend following memory map
> > >>>>>>+     * ___________________________________
> > >>>>>>+     * |4k pages | hugepages | 4k pages
> > >>>>>Can we really do this?
> > >>>>>The problem is AFAIU migration stream is sending pages only in target
> > >>>>>page size, even for huge pages... so even for huge pages we should
> > >>>>>still need per TARGET_PAGE_SIZE bitmap?
> > >>>>sending maybe, but copying to userfault fd is doing in hugepage size
> > >>>Yes you are right. :)
> > >>>
> > >>>>in case of hugetlbfs memory backend.
> > >>>>>(Please refer to ram_state_init() on init of RAMBlock.bmap)
> > >>>>I thought to use bitmap per ramblock, but I decided to not do it,
> > >>>>because of following reasons:
> > >>>>	1. There is only 4k ramblocks, for such ramblock it's not
> > >>>>	optimal
> > >>>Could you explain what do you mean by "there is only 4k ramblocks"?
> > >>sorry, could be ramblocks with 4k size,
> > >>as example, your's qemu hmp info ramblock shows
> > >>  Block Name    PSize              Offset Used              Total
> > >>             /objects/mem    2 MiB  0x0000000000000000 0x0000000020000000
> > >>0x0000000020000000
> > >>                 vga.vram    4 KiB  0x0000000020060000 0x0000000001000000
> > >>0x0000000001000000
> > >>     /rom@etc/acpi/tables    4 KiB  0x0000000021130000 0x0000000000020000
> > >>0x0000000000200000
> > >>                  pc.bios    4 KiB  0x0000000020000000 0x0000000000040000
> > >>0x0000000000040000
> > >>   0000:00:03.0/e1000.rom    4 KiB  0x0000000021070000 0x0000000000040000
> > >>0x0000000000040000
> > >>   0000:00:04.0/e1000.rom    4 KiB  0x00000000210b0000 0x0000000000040000
> > >>0x0000000000040000
> > >>   0000:00:05.0/e1000.rom    4 KiB  0x00000000210f0000 0x0000000000040000
> > >>0x0000000000040000
> > >>                   pc.rom    4 KiB  0x0000000020040000 0x0000000000020000
> > >>0x0000000000020000
> > >>     0000:00:02.0/vga.rom    4 KiB  0x0000000021060000 0x0000000000010000
> > >>0x0000000000010000
> > >>    /rom@etc/table-loader    4 KiB  0x0000000021330000 0x0000000000001000
> > >>0x0000000000001000
> > >>       /rom@etc/acpi/rsdp    4 KiB  0x0000000021331000 0x0000000000001000
> > >>0x0000000000001000
> > >>
> > >>/rom@etc/table-loader and /rom@etc/acpi/rsdp has only one 4K page.
> > >I see. Thanks for explaining this.
> > >
> > >A 4k sized ramblock means the bitmap would be only one unsigned long
> > >width (via bitmap_new(1)). I still don't see why it's not good... :-)
> > >
> > Ok, I'll take into account your comment, and I'll place copied
> > 
> > bitmap into RAMBlock.
> 
> Or we can wait for further comments in case you'll do extra work. :-)
> 
> Just to mention that Dave won't be here until next week, so you may
> need to wait for some days until he can provide some further input.

(Catches up with mail)

So I think I agree with Peter here; if we allocate the bitmap in the
same way as our other bitmaps it'll perhaps be easier for people to
understand both of them.
Especially now Juan has changed that to be individual bitmaps per
RAMBlock rather than one big bitmap; it avoids having to work out
offsets into the bitmap.

Dave

> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Peter Xu
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK