From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lvivier@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ram: Use MigrationStats for statistics
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:08:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170607030857.GA6479@pxdev.xzpeter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ink958cm.fsf@secure.mitica>
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 07:33:45PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 01:34:45PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> > RAM Statistics need to survive migration to make info migrate work, so we
> >> > need to store them outside of RAMState. As we already have an struct
> >> > with those fields, just used them. (MigrationStats and XBZRLECacheStats).
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> Hmm OK; this feels very much like it's the opposite of 180f61f from
> >> March; these variables keep moving around over the last couple of months
> >> - are they going to stay still now?
> >
> > O:-)
> >
> > Meanwhile, I don't know whether it'll be necessary to remove all the
> > functions like ram_bytes_transferred(), e.g., it would be just:
> >
> > uint64_t ram_bytes_transferred(void)
> > {
> > - return ram_state.bytes_transferred;
> > + return ram_counters.transferred;
> > }
> >
> > But I'm okay with either.
>
> That value was only used for filling the statistics. And we are filling
> a struct from another struct of the exact same type. Going through an
> exported function looks stranger.
>
> And as said in $commit, the idea was that creating a new counter was
> easy, right now you have to:
>
> - add it to MigrationParam (still have to do this)
> - add it to MigrationParams (still have to do this)
> - create the field in MigrationStats or RAMState
> - create a function that exports it
> - add that function in ram.h to export it
> - add it on qmp_query (still have to do this)
>
> So, we are moving from 6 steps to 3 steps. I think we are much better
> now, no? O:-)
Hmm, okay!
(as long as we won't move these functions back one day :-)
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 22:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Make RAMState dynamic Juan Quintela
2017-06-01 22:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] ram: Call migration_page_queue_free() at ram_migration_cleanup() Juan Quintela
2017-06-05 11:24 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-06-06 7:58 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-01 22:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] ram: Move ZERO_TARGET_PAGE inside XBZRLE Juan Quintela
2017-06-05 11:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-06-06 7:59 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-01 22:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] migration: Print statistics about the number of remaining target pages Juan Quintela
2017-06-02 15:15 ` Eric Blake
2017-06-02 16:36 ` Juan Quintela
2017-06-06 17:48 ` Juan Quintela
2017-06-01 22:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] ram: Use MigrationStats for statistics Juan Quintela
2017-06-05 12:34 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-06-06 8:05 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-06 17:33 ` Juan Quintela
2017-06-07 3:08 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2017-06-01 22:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] ram: Make RAMState dynamic Juan Quintela
2017-06-05 15:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-06-06 8:16 ` Peter Xu
2017-06-06 17:39 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170607030857.GA6479@pxdev.xzpeter.org \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).