From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIx8G-00083W-QL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:05:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIx8D-0006CY-4Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:05:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIx8C-0006Bb-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:05:45 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071558124F for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:05:36 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20170608130536.GD4427@noname.redhat.com> References: <20170601221552.30628-1-quintela@redhat.com> <8737bbd6qb.fsf@secure.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8737bbd6qb.fsf@secure.mitica> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Create setup/cleanup methods for migration incoming side List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lvivier@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi , dgilbert@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com Am 07.06.2017 um 19:53 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben: > Juan Quintela wrote: > > Hi > > Hi Kevin and Stefan, I intended to cc you on this series. > > Is this what you were asking for block layer migration? > > Do you need anything else? I didn't manage to apply this to my local git tree, so my review is based on scanning the emails. The important part for us is probably where you call the .cleanup_load callback. As I commented on the patch, I don't see any place in this series that calls it. We need it before bdrv_invalidate_cache_all() is called, I think. Kevin