From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qemu-iotests: Test exiting qemu with running job
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:55:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170609155543.GF4462@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea981c62-61c5-8870-3ba2-8469f8c4fa5f@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3274 bytes --]
Am 09.06.2017 um 16:16 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 06/09/2017 07:58 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 09.06.2017 um 14:14 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> >> On 06/09/2017 06:50 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> When qemu is exited, all running jobs should be cancelled successfully.
> >>> This adds a test for this for all types of block jobs that currently
> >>> exist in qemu.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>
> >>> +{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "SHUTDOWN", "data": {"guest": false}}
> >>> +{"timestamp": {"seconds": TIMESTAMP, "microseconds": TIMESTAMP}, "event": "BLOCK_JOB_CANCELLED", "data": {"device": "disk", "len": 67108864, "offset": 524288, "speed": 65536, "type": "commit"}}
> >>
> >> I'm worried that if you don't sanitize at least offset, you will still
> >> be prone to some race conditions changing the output. You may want to
> >> add in some additional filtering on the output to be safer.
> >
> > I considered that at first, but then I realised that these offsets are
> > indeed predictable and we want to know if they change (it would likely
> > mean that the throttling is broken).
> >
> > If you look at the individual cases, we have:
> >
> > * offset=512k for (intermediate) commit and streaming. This is exactly
> > the buffer size for a single request and will be followed by a delay
> > of eight seconds before the next chunk is copied, so we will never get
> > a different value here.
> >
> > * offset=4M for active commit and mirror, because the mirror job has a
> > larger buffer size by default, so one request completes it all. This
> > number is already the maximum, so nothing is going to change here
> > either.
> >
> > * offset=64k for backup, which works cluster by cluster. We know that
> > the cluster size is exactly 64k, and while we have only one second
> > of delay here, that's still plenty of time for the 'quit' command to
> > arrive.
>
> These belong in comments in the test proper, because it is not obvious
> otherwise. But with comments added (so someone debugging a theoretical
> test failure down the road knows what they are up against),
# Note that the reference output intentionally includes the 'offset' field in
# BLOCK_JOB_CANCELLED events for all of the following block jobs. They are
# predictable and any change in the offsets would hint at a bug in the job
# throttling code.
#
# In order to achieve these predictable offsets, all of the following tests
# use speed=65536. Each job will perform exactly one iteration before it has
# to sleep at least for a second, which is plenty of time for the 'quit' QMP
# command to be received (after receiving the command, the rest runs
# synchronously, so jobs can arbitrarily continue or complete).
#
# The buffer size for commit and streaming is 512k (waiting for 8 seconds after
# the first request), for active commit and mirror it's large enough to cover
# the full 4M, and for backup it's the qcow2 cluster size, which we know is
# 64k. As all of these are at least as large as the speed, we are sure that the
# offset doesn't advance after the first iteration before qemu exits.
Does this look okay?
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-09 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-09 11:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] commit: Fix completion with extra reference Kevin Wolf
2017-06-09 11:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] " Kevin Wolf
2017-06-09 12:05 ` Eric Blake
2017-06-09 14:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Max Reitz
2017-06-09 11:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] qemu-iotests: Allow starting new qemu after cleanup Kevin Wolf
2017-06-09 12:05 ` Eric Blake
2017-06-09 14:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Max Reitz
2017-06-09 11:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] qemu-iotests: Test exiting qemu with running job Kevin Wolf
2017-06-09 12:14 ` Eric Blake
2017-06-09 12:58 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-06-09 14:16 ` Eric Blake
2017-06-09 15:55 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2017-06-09 17:07 ` Eric Blake
2017-06-09 14:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Max Reitz
2017-06-09 14:24 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170609155543.GF4462@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).