From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] exec: fix access to ram_list.dirty_memory when sync dirty bitmap
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:04:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170628100428.GA29104@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170628083704.24997-1-haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1249 bytes --]
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:37:04PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> In cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, ...), the 2nd
> argument 'start' is relative to the start of the ramblock 'rb'. When
> it's used to access the dirty memory bitmap of ram_list (i.e.
> ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]->blocks[]), an offset to
> the start of all RAM (i.e. rb->offset) should be added to it, which has
> however been missed since c/s 6b6712efcc. For a ramblock of host memory
> backend whose offset is not zero, cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap()
> synchronizes the incorrect part of the dirty memory bitmap of ram_list
> to the per ramblock dirty bitmap. As a result, a guest with host
> memory backend may crash after migration.
>
> Fix it by adding the offset of ramblock when accessing the dirty memory
> bitmap of ram_list in cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap().
>
> Reported-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * Avoid shadowing variable 'offset'. (Paolo)
> ---
> include/exec/ram_addr.h | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Tested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-28 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 8:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] exec: fix access to ram_list.dirty_memory when sync dirty bitmap Haozhong Zhang
2017-06-28 10:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2017-06-28 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-28 11:38 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170628100428.GA29104@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=haozhong.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).