From: "Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] change x86 default machine type to Q35?
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:39:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170707133949.GH10776@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5233eee1-a017-ccae-3458-762c9e86902c@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 12:32:10PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 05/07/2017 11:14, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> > On 05.07.2017 08:57, Chao Peng wrote:
> > >
> > > Q35 has been in QEMU for quite a while. Compared to the current default
> > > i440FX, Q35 is probably not that mature and not widely used, however in
> > > some case, Q35 has advantages, for example, in supporting new features.
> > > For instance, we have some features require PCI-e support which is only
> > > available on Q35 and some others need it for EFI support. It is of
> > > course not necessary to change it as the default but if more and more
> > > features have dependencies on Q35 because of requiring much more modern
> > > features then I think it may be worth to do so. In such case we can have
> > > more people to use it and find problems we may know or not know.
> >
>
> Agreed
>
> > Yes, IMHO at one point in time, we should switch the default machine
> > type to q35.
>
> +1
>
> > The i440FX is really quite old...
> >
> > > There are certainly some drawbacks:
> > > - Compatibility: current code or script may need adjustment
> >
> > That might be a real concern ...
>
> I am not so sure about that. Developers working on upstream projects
> should expect such changes and, for our case,
> modifying the command line by adding "-M pc" should not be a big deal.
We could print a warning for 1 or 2 releases when users don't add
a explicit "-M pc" or "-M q35" argument to qemu-system-x86_64,
but:
>
> The upper layers should manage the defaults by themselves so
> are not supposed to be affected.
But they would be. libvirt uses the default machine-type from
QEMU.
> [...]
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-07 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 6:57 [Qemu-devel] change x86 default machine type to Q35? Chao Peng
2017-07-05 8:14 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-05 9:32 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-07-07 13:39 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2017-07-07 15:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-07-07 18:03 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-10 7:42 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-07-10 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-10 13:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-10 16:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-07-10 17:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-11 7:48 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-11 8:01 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-07-11 8:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-07-11 14:42 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-07-11 14:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-12 6:39 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-07-12 15:17 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-12 5:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-07-12 6:18 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2017-07-12 8:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2017-07-11 14:47 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-05 11:07 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-05 11:13 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-06 10:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-07-06 10:41 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-11 10:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2017-07-05 10:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-07-05 11:04 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-05 11:44 ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-05 11:58 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-05 12:22 ` Fam Zheng
2017-07-06 10:49 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-06 10:57 ` Peter Maydell
2017-07-06 11:00 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-06 11:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-07-06 11:12 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-06 11:13 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-07 13:49 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-05 12:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170707133949.GH10776@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).