From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, thuth@redhat.com,
pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/7] s390x/pci: fence off instructions for non-pci
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:04:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170707150452.1f12890b@dhcp-192-215.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e4e8d2d-66f6-8884-96a1-83f285171c13@de.ibm.com>
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 14:55:23 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 07/07/2017 02:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > If a guest running on a non-pci build issues a pci instruction,
> > throw them an exception.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > target/s390x/kvm.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> > index a3d00196f4..c5c7c27a21 100644
> > --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> > @@ -1160,6 +1160,9 @@ static int kvm_clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> > {
> > uint8_t r2 = (run->s390_sieic.ipb & 0x000f0000) >> 16;
> >
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_PCI
> > + return -1;
> > +#endif
>
> Instead of this ifdefing, can you use the cpu model to decide if the instruction
> should be available? We need to do this anyway for proper handling.
>
> You can then fence off the PCI bits in the CPU model for
> CONFIG_PCI == off.
Sounds like a good idea, I'll give it a try.
We'll probably also want to fence off the sclp facility bit via that
mechanism.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-07 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-07 12:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/7] s390x: zPCI detangling Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/7] kvm: remove hard dependency on pci Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 13:11 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-07 13:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/7] s390x: chsc nt2 events are pci-only Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 13:01 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-07-07 13:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/7] s390x/sclp: properly guard pci-specific functions Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/7] s390x/ccw: create s390 phb conditionally Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/7] s390x/pci: fence off instructions for non-pci Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:55 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-07-07 13:04 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-07-10 11:04 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-10 12:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-07-10 12:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 13:00 ` Thomas Huth
2017-07-07 13:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/7] s390x/kvm: msi route fixup " Cornelia Huck
2017-07-07 12:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 7/7] s390x: refine pci dependencies Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170707150452.1f12890b@dhcp-192-215.str.redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).