From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUr8k-0003Tl-PX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 05:07:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUr8f-0005qy-Qp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 05:07:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUr8f-0005qi-KC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 05:07:25 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8587180C26 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:07:21 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20170711090721.GE4335@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <20170710165827.4250-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20170710165827.4250-2-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20170711082836.GB4335@noname.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] qcow2: make qcow2_do_open a coroutine_fn List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Am 11.07.2017 um 10:34 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > On 11/07/2017 10:28, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 10.07.2017 um 18:58 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > >> It is called from qcow2_invalidate_cache in coroutine context, so always > >> load metadata from a coroutine. > >> --- > >> block/qcow2.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > >> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Missing S-o-b on patches 1 and 2? > > Oops, yes. Though I don't think these patches are for 2.10. They are > on top of Stefan's bdrv_co_create series, by the way. Why not for 2.10? They look simple and self-contained. I haven't looked at bdrv_co_create yet, but it shouldn't be much more complicated either. Kevin