From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX5xY-0001ou-Nx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:21:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX5xV-0000PN-Io for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:21:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX5xV-0000Ot-D2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:21:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:21:05 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20170717162054-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1499964378-24344-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <415ee774-cab4-f48a-c081-c2158de35b50@redhat.com> <1689390822.16456651.1500013233018.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20170714173646-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <374a73f0-b83a-1b1f-d28f-65610cffe364@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <374a73f0-b83a-1b1f-d28f-65610cffe364@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: switch pxe and vm gen id tests to use kvm List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laurent Vivier Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Ben Warren On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 09:28:15AM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote: > On 14/07/2017 16:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:20:33AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> > >>> NACK. > >>> > >>> It's not that simple. If you do it like this, you then suddenly get > >>> these ugly '"kvm" accelerator not found' messages during "make check" > >>> which we really should avoid. > >> > >> You're right, I thought these were shut up before with Laurent's patch. > >> I think we should print a single message at the end, like > >> > >> qemu: -machine accel=kvm:xen: No accelerator found > >> > >> Paolo > > > > That's exactly Laurent's patch, isn't it? > > > > Do you want I send an updated and a more formal patch? > > Thanks, > Laurent Yes pls.