From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Jay Zhou <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com,
armbru@redhat.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com,
zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com,
weidong.huang@huawei.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: optimize the downtime
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:03:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170724190331.GH2127@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cea170f-90eb-78e5-6b52-8dd882efd160@redhat.com>
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 24/07/2017 17:35, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Jay Zhou (jianjay.zhou@huawei.com) wrote:
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> On 2017/7/21 17:49, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >>> * Jay Zhou (jianjay.zhou@huawei.com) wrote:
> >>>> Qemu_savevm_state_cleanup() takes about 300ms in my ram migration tests
> >>>> with a 8U24G vm(20G is really occupied), the main cost comes from
> >>>> KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION ioctl when mem.memory_size = 0 in
> >>>> kvm_set_user_memory_region(). In kmod, the main cost is
> >>>> kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(), which traverses the active_mmu_pages list to
> >>>> zap the unsync sptes.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jay,
> >>> Is this actually increasing the real downtime when the guest isn't
> >>> running, or is it just the reported time? I see that the s->downtime
> >>> value is calculated right after where we currently call
> >>> qemu_savevm_state_cleanup.
> >>
> >> It actually increased the real downtime, I used the "ping" command to
> >> test. Reason is that the source side libvirt sends qmp to qemu to query
> >> the status of migration, which needs the BQL. qemu_savevm_state_cleanup
> >> is done with BQL, qemu can not handle the qmp if qemu_savevm_state_cleanup
> >> has not finished. And the source side libvirt delays about 300ms to notify
> >> the destination side libvirt to send the "cont" command to start the vm.
> >>
> >> I think the value of s->downtime is not accurate enough, maybe we could
> >> move the calculation of end_time after qemu_savevm_state_cleanup has done.
> >
> > I'm copying in Paolo, Radim and Andrea- is there anyway we can make the
> > teardown of KVMs dirty tracking not take so long? 300ms is a silly long time
> > on only a small VM.
>
> Xiao Guangrong is working on something vaguely related (but different
> and simpler because it's entirely contained within KVM), which is to
> make log_sync faster.
>
> The Intel folks working on clear containers also would like
> MemoryListeners to have a better complexity, but that's again separate
> from the "zapping" of SPTEs.
They do keep popping up; I remember they're a pain in COLO.
> > Can you tell me which version of libvirt you're using?
> > I thought the newer ones were supposed to use events so they did't
> > have to poll qemu.
> >
> > If we move qemu_savevm_state_cleanup is it still safe? Are there
> > some things we're supposed to do at that point which are wrong if
> > we don't.
> >
> > I wonder about something like; take a mutex in
> > memory_global_dirty_log_start, release it in
> > memory_global_dirty_log_stop. Then make ram_save_cleanup start
> > a new thread that does the call to memory_global_dirty_log_stop.
>
> I don't like having such a long-lived mutex (it seems like a recipe for
> deadlocks with the BQL), plus memory_region_transaction_commit (the
> expensive part of memory_global_dirty_log_stop) needs to be under the
> BQL itself because it calls MemoryListeners.
>
> Maybe memory_global_dirty_log_stop can delay itself to the next vm_start
> if it's called while runstate_running() returns false (which should be
> always the case)?
>
> It could even be entirely enclosed within memory.c if you do it with a
> VMChangeStateHandler.
This still causes the BQL to be held for quite a while; albeit at a less
critical point.
In this and the existing case we don't actually need efficiency - what we need is just
not to be holding onto the BQL for so long; could we do a less
efficient commit here, removing one region at a time, yielding the lock
and retaking it?
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
> > Dave
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jay
> >>
> >>> However, we would need to be a bit careful of anything that needs
> >>> cleaning up before the source restarts on failure; I'm not sure of
> >>> the semantics of all the current things wired into save_cleanup.
> >>>
> >>> Dave
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jay Zhou <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> migration/migration.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> >>>> qmp.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> >>>> index a0db40d..72832be 100644
> >>>> --- a/migration/migration.c
> >>>> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> >>>> @@ -1877,6 +1877,15 @@ static void *migration_thread(void *opaque)
> >>>> if (qemu_file_get_error(s->to_dst_file)) {
> >>>> migrate_set_state(&s->state, current_active_state,
> >>>> MIGRATION_STATUS_FAILED);
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * The resource has been allocated by migration will be reused in
> >>>> + * COLO process, so don't release them.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + if (!enable_colo) {
> >>>> + qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >>>> + qemu_savevm_state_cleanup();
> >>>> + qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> >>>> + }
> >>>> trace_migration_thread_file_err();
> >>>> break;
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -1916,13 +1925,6 @@ static void *migration_thread(void *opaque)
> >>>> end_time = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
> >>>>
> >>>> qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> >>>> - /*
> >>>> - * The resource has been allocated by migration will be reused in COLO
> >>>> - * process, so don't release them.
> >>>> - */
> >>>> - if (!enable_colo) {
> >>>> - qemu_savevm_state_cleanup();
> >>>> - }
> >>>> if (s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED) {
> >>>> uint64_t transferred_bytes = qemu_ftell(s->to_dst_file);
> >>>> s->total_time = end_time - s->total_time;
> >>>> diff --git a/qmp.c b/qmp.c
> >>>> index b86201e..0e68eaa 100644
> >>>> --- a/qmp.c
> >>>> +++ b/qmp.c
> >>>> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
> >>>> #include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
> >>>> #include "hw/mem/pc-dimm.h"
> >>>> #include "hw/acpi/acpi_dev_interface.h"
> >>>> +#include "migration/migration.h"
> >>>> +#include "migration/savevm.h"
> >>>>
> >>>> NameInfo *qmp_query_name(Error **errp)
> >>>> {
> >>>> @@ -200,6 +202,14 @@ void qmp_cont(Error **errp)
> >>>> if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) {
> >>>> autostart = 1;
> >>>> } else {
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * Delay the cleanup to reduce the downtime of migration.
> >>>> + * The resource has been allocated by migration will be reused
> >>>> + * in COLO process, so don't release them.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_POSTMIGRATE) && !migrate_colo_enabled()) {
> >>>> + qemu_savevm_state_cleanup();
> >>>> + }
> >>>> vm_start();
> >>>> }
> >>>> }
> >>>> --
> >>>> 1.8.3.1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>
> > --
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> >
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-24 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 3:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: optimize the downtime Jay Zhou
2017-07-20 4:23 ` no-reply
2017-07-21 9:49 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-21 12:23 ` Jay Zhou
2017-07-24 15:35 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-24 16:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-24 19:03 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-07-24 20:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-25 19:15 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-27 14:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-25 7:29 ` Jay Zhou
2017-07-25 8:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-07-25 7:09 ` Jay Zhou
2017-07-25 10:34 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-07-31 7:04 ` Jay Zhou
2017-07-31 13:33 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170724190331.GH2127@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@tencent.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).