From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daiEu-0000jc-Pf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:50:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daiEu-00035m-4p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:50:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:49:52 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170727124952.GL5117@lemon.lan> References: <1498728221-23979-1-git-send-email-ashijeetacharya@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1498728221-23979-1-git-send-email-ashijeetacharya@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/8] Optimize VMDK I/O by allocating multiple clusters List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ashijeet Acharya Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com On Thu, 06/29 14:53, Ashijeet Acharya wrote: > Changes in v7: > - comment the use of MIN() in calculating skip_end_bytes > - use extent->cluster_sectors instead of 128 > - place check for m_data != NULL > - use g_new0(VmdkMetaData, 1) instead of g_malloc0(sizeof(*m_data)) There is a minor regression as I replied inline, otherwise: Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng