qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] block/qapi: Remove redundat NULL check to silence Coverity
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:17:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170731151724.GH6240@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e788182-b778-e027-2250-8e7c643786ae@amsat.org>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:54:57AM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 07/31/2017 11:38 AM, Jeff Cody wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:51:11PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>When skipping implicit nodes in bdrv_block_device_info(), we know that
> >>bs0 is always non-NULL; initially, because it's taken from a BdrvChild
> >
> >Not to mention, we deference bs0 in the chunk of code right above this, so
> >we'd segfault anyway if the initial value was NULL.
> 
> Yes, please move your assert before:
> 
> 137:    if (bs0->drv && bs0->backing) {
> 
> Once there:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>

I don't think moving the assert() is the correct thing to do, as it is
useful when iterating in the while() via backing_bs().

But maybe adding some asserts would be useful, if we are really concerned.
Looking at the code:

135         }
136

Maybe add an assert(bs0) here, as you suggest...

137         if (bs0->drv && bs0->backing) {
138             info->backing_file_depth++;
139             bs0 = bs0->backing->bs;

But then maybe we want one here, too?  Or maybe that is overkill :)

140             (*p_image_info)->has_backing_image = true;
141             p_image_info = &((*p_image_info)->backing_image);
142         } else {
143             break;
144         }
145
146         /* Skip automatically inserted nodes that the user isn't aware of for
147          * query-block (blk != NULL), but not for query-named-block-nodes */
148         while (blk && bs0 && bs0->drv && bs0->implicit) {
149             bs0 = backing_bs(bs0);
150         }



> >
> >>and a BdrvChild never has a NULL bs, and after the first iteration
> >>because implicit nodes always have a backing file.
> >>
> >>Remove the NULL check and add an assertion that the implicit node does
> >>indeed have a backing file.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> >
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
> >
> >
> >
> >>---
> >>  block/qapi.c | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/block/qapi.c b/block/qapi.c
> >>index d2b18ee9df..5f1a71f5d2 100644
> >>--- a/block/qapi.c
> >>+++ b/block/qapi.c
> >>@@ -145,8 +145,9 @@ BlockDeviceInfo *bdrv_block_device_info(BlockBackend *blk,
> >>          /* Skip automatically inserted nodes that the user isn't aware of for
> >>           * query-block (blk != NULL), but not for query-named-block-nodes */
> >>-        while (blk && bs0 && bs0->drv && bs0->implicit) {
> >>+        while (blk && bs0->drv && bs0->implicit) {
> >>              bs0 = backing_bs(bs0);
> >>+            assert(bs0);
> >>          }
> >>      }
> >>-- 
> >>2.13.3
> >>
> >>
> >

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-31 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-31 12:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] block/qapi: Remove redundat NULL check to silence Coverity Kevin Wolf
2017-07-31 13:06 ` Eric Blake
2017-07-31 14:00   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Eric Blake
2017-07-31 14:07     ` Kevin Wolf
2017-07-31 14:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jeff Cody
2017-07-31 14:54   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-07-31 15:13     ` Kevin Wolf
2017-07-31 15:17     ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2017-07-31 15:30       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170731151724.GH6240@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).