From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddqzt-0003eT-4x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 00:47:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddqzs-0007rt-KJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 00:47:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 06:47:24 +0200 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Message-ID: <20170805044724.GH4859@toto> References: <1501692241-23310-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <1501692241-23310-10-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <20170803153800.GR4859@toto> <854126f3-84da-087c-f35b-480165871e7f@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <854126f3-84da-087c-f35b-480165871e7f@twiddle.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 09/15] target/arm: Don't store M profile PRIMASK and FAULTMASK in daif List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:05:17PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 08/03/2017 08:38 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > >> + uint32_t primask; > >> + uint32_t faultmask; > > It seems like these could be booleans? > > I was thinking the same thing until I read the v8m description as a 32-bit > register. This makes qemu match the spec, which has value. > Ah, I didn't check the spec :-)