From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60126)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1deblJ-00041H-Kk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 02:43:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1deblG-0007o5-HS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 02:43:37 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36978)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1deblG-0007nk-Al
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 02:43:34 -0400
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.11.16])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDD7C5D698
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon,  7 Aug 2017 06:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:43:30 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170807064330.GF14780@lemon>
References: <150181165680.60.17068931498958654477@93e45bedd699>
	<d13bf86c-036d-4178-9d1d-52443ba226b6@redhat.com>
	<20170804121031.GA1913@lemon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170804121031.GA1913@lemon>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/22] Clean up around qmp() and hmp()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 08/04 20:10, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, 08/04 06:50, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 08/03/2017 08:54 PM, no-reply@patchew.org wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
> > > their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
> > > locally.
> > 
> > When will patchew have a syntax for stating dependencies? (Of course, I
> > should actually mention those dependencies in my cover letter, not after
> > the fact).
> 
> I can give it a try this weekend, if it works, it will be announced on this
> list.

Hijack! As an experiment of the newly pushed "base" tag handling on the server:

Based-on: 20170802201900.11890-1-eblake@redhat.com

(Eric, the syntax is simple and strict for now: "Based-on: $MESSAGE_ID", if you
find something serious lacking (e.g. human readability), please let me know).

Fam