From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dez5a-0003PF-Uu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 03:38:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dez5a-0008Qa-1v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 03:38:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 09:37:56 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20170808073756.GA4850@dhcp-200-186.str.redhat.com> References: <20170803150301.10177-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170803150301.10177-1-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/5] block: bdrv_reopen() fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 03.08.2017 um 17:02 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben: > This is the first part of some fixes to bdrv_reopen(), which seems > reasonable enough to merge for 2.10. > > There is much more wrong with bdrv_reopen() currently, especially with > respect to op blocker permissions (basically the required permissions > can change based on the options used in bdrv_reopen(), and both things > affect the whole tree and aren't integrated with each other at all), but > I have little hope to get this fixed before 2.10, so let's start with > what is ready now. Applied to the block branch. Kevin