qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling
@ 2017-08-09 13:33 David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/6] kvm: require JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS David Hildenbrand
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2017-08-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm, david

If I am not missing something important here, we can heavily simplify
the kvm_slot code. Flatview will make sure that we don't have to deal
with overlapping slots. E.g. when a memory section is resized, we are
first notified about the removal and then about the new memory section.

So basically, we can directly always map one memory section to one
kvm slot (if the fixed up size is > 0).

Only very briefly tested. Will do some more testing if we agree that this
is the right thing to do.

David Hildenbrand (6):
  kvm: require JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS
  kvm: factor out alignment of memory section
  kvm: use start + size for memory ranges
  kvm: we never have overlapping slots in kvm_set_phys_mem()
  kvm: kvm_log_start/stop are only called with known sections
  kvm: kvm_log_sync() is only called with known memory sections

 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 276 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)

-- 
2.9.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/6] kvm: require JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS
  2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
@ 2017-08-09 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/6] kvm: factor out alignment of memory section David Hildenbrand
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2017-08-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm, david

We already require DESTROY_MEMORY_REGION_WORKS, JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS
was added just half a year later.

In addition, with flatview overlapping memory regions are first
removed before adding the changed one. So we can't really detect joining
memory regions this way.

Let's just get rid of this special handling.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 42 +-----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index 46ce479..eae61bb 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ struct KVMState
     int coalesced_mmio;
     struct kvm_coalesced_mmio_ring *coalesced_mmio_ring;
     bool coalesced_flush_in_progress;
-    int broken_set_mem_region;
     int vcpu_events;
     int robust_singlestep;
     int debugregs;
@@ -127,6 +126,7 @@ static bool kvm_immediate_exit;
 static const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_required_capabilites[] = {
     KVM_CAP_INFO(USER_MEMORY),
     KVM_CAP_INFO(DESTROY_MEMORY_REGION_WORKS),
+    KVM_CAP_INFO(JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS),
     KVM_CAP_LAST_INFO
 };
 
@@ -696,7 +696,6 @@ kvm_check_extension_list(KVMState *s, const KVMCapabilityInfo *list)
 static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
                              MemoryRegionSection *section, bool add)
 {
-    KVMState *s = kvm_state;
     KVMSlot *mem, old;
     int err;
     MemoryRegion *mr = section->mr;
@@ -763,35 +762,6 @@ static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
             abort();
         }
 
-        /* Workaround for older KVM versions: we can't join slots, even not by
-         * unregistering the previous ones and then registering the larger
-         * slot. We have to maintain the existing fragmentation. Sigh.
-         *
-         * This workaround assumes that the new slot starts at the same
-         * address as the first existing one. If not or if some overlapping
-         * slot comes around later, we will fail (not seen in practice so far)
-         * - and actually require a recent KVM version. */
-        if (s->broken_set_mem_region &&
-            old.start_addr == start_addr && old.memory_size < size && add) {
-            mem = kvm_alloc_slot(kml);
-            mem->memory_size = old.memory_size;
-            mem->start_addr = old.start_addr;
-            mem->ram = old.ram;
-            mem->flags = kvm_mem_flags(mr);
-
-            err = kvm_set_user_memory_region(kml, mem);
-            if (err) {
-                fprintf(stderr, "%s: error updating slot: %s\n", __func__,
-                        strerror(-err));
-                abort();
-            }
-
-            start_addr += old.memory_size;
-            ram += old.memory_size;
-            size -= old.memory_size;
-            continue;
-        }
-
         /* register prefix slot */
         if (old.start_addr < start_addr) {
             mem = kvm_alloc_slot(kml);
@@ -833,10 +803,6 @@ static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
         }
     }
 
-    /* in case the KVM bug workaround already "consumed" the new slot */
-    if (!size) {
-        return;
-    }
     if (!add) {
         return;
     }
@@ -1692,12 +1658,6 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
 
     s->coalesced_mmio = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_COALESCED_MMIO);
 
-    s->broken_set_mem_region = 1;
-    ret = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS);
-    if (ret > 0) {
-        s->broken_set_mem_region = 0;
-    }
-
 #ifdef KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS
     s->vcpu_events = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS);
 #endif
-- 
2.9.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/6] kvm: factor out alignment of memory section
  2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/6] kvm: require JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS David Hildenbrand
@ 2017-08-09 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/6] kvm: use start + size for memory ranges David Hildenbrand
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2017-08-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm, david

Factor it out, so we can reuse it later.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index eae61bb..f6ceeba 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -190,6 +190,36 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_matching_slot(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
 }
 
 /*
+ * Calculate and align the start address and the size of the section.
+ * Return the size. If the size is 0, the aligned section is empty.
+ */
+static hwaddr kvm_align_section(MemoryRegionSection *section,
+                                hwaddr *start)
+{
+    hwaddr size = int128_get64(section->size);
+    hwaddr delta;
+
+    *start = section->offset_within_address_space;
+
+    /* kvm works in page size chunks, but the function may be called
+       with sub-page size and unaligned start address. Pad the start
+       address to next and truncate size to previous page boundary. */
+    delta = qemu_real_host_page_size - (*start & ~qemu_real_host_page_mask);
+    delta &= ~qemu_real_host_page_mask;
+    *start += delta;
+    if (delta > size) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+    size -= delta;
+    size &= qemu_real_host_page_mask;
+    if (*start & ~qemu_real_host_page_mask) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+
+    return size;
+}
+
+/*
  * Find overlapping slot with lowest start address
  */
 static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
@@ -700,25 +730,8 @@ static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
     int err;
     MemoryRegion *mr = section->mr;
     bool writeable = !mr->readonly && !mr->rom_device;
-    hwaddr start_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
-    ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
-    void *ram = NULL;
-    unsigned delta;
-
-    /* kvm works in page size chunks, but the function may be called
-       with sub-page size and unaligned start address. Pad the start
-       address to next and truncate size to previous page boundary. */
-    delta = qemu_real_host_page_size - (start_addr & ~qemu_real_host_page_mask);
-    delta &= ~qemu_real_host_page_mask;
-    if (delta > size) {
-        return;
-    }
-    start_addr += delta;
-    size -= delta;
-    size &= qemu_real_host_page_mask;
-    if (!size || (start_addr & ~qemu_real_host_page_mask)) {
-        return;
-    }
+    hwaddr start_addr, size;
+    void *ram;
 
     if (!memory_region_is_ram(mr)) {
         if (writeable || !kvm_readonly_mem_allowed) {
@@ -730,7 +743,13 @@ static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
         }
     }
 
-    ram = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(mr) + section->offset_within_region + delta;
+    size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
+    if (!size) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    ram = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(mr) + section->offset_within_region +
+          (section->offset_within_address_space - start_addr);
 
     while (1) {
         mem = kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(kml, start_addr, start_addr + size);
-- 
2.9.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/6] kvm: use start + size for memory ranges
  2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/6] kvm: require JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/6] kvm: factor out alignment of memory section David Hildenbrand
@ 2017-08-09 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/6] kvm: we never have overlapping slots in kvm_set_phys_mem() David Hildenbrand
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2017-08-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm, david

Convert kvm_lookup_matching_slot().

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index f6ceeba..bec157e 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_alloc_slot(KVMMemoryListener *kml)
 
 static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_matching_slot(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
                                          hwaddr start_addr,
-                                         hwaddr end_addr)
+                                         hwaddr size)
 {
     KVMState *s = kvm_state;
     int i;
@@ -180,8 +180,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_matching_slot(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
     for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
         KVMSlot *mem = &kml->slots[i];
 
-        if (start_addr == mem->start_addr &&
-            end_addr == mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size) {
+        if (start_addr == mem->start_addr && size == mem->memory_size) {
             return mem;
         }
     }
@@ -414,7 +413,7 @@ static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
 {
     hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
     ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
-    KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, phys_addr + size);
+    KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
 
     if (mem == NULL)  {
         return 0;
-- 
2.9.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/6] kvm: we never have overlapping slots in kvm_set_phys_mem()
  2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/6] kvm: use start + size for memory ranges David Hildenbrand
@ 2017-08-09 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/6] kvm: kvm_log_start/stop are only called with known sections David Hildenbrand
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2017-08-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm, david

Due to how flatviews are handled, we will never have overlapping memory
sections in kvm.

address_space_update_topology_pass() will make sure that we will only
get called for

a) an existing memory section for which we only update parameters
(log_start, log_stop).
b) an existing memory section we want to delete (region_del)
c) a brand new memory section we want to add (region_add)

We cannot have overlapping memory sections in kvm as we will first remove
the overlapping sections and then add the ones without conflicts.

Therefore we can remove the complexity for handling prefix and suffix
slots.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 69 +++++++++--------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index bec157e..7b45506 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ kvm_check_extension_list(KVMState *s, const KVMCapabilityInfo *list)
 static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
                              MemoryRegionSection *section, bool add)
 {
-    KVMSlot *mem, old;
+    KVMSlot *mem;
     int err;
     MemoryRegion *mr = section->mr;
     bool writeable = !mr->readonly && !mr->rom_device;
@@ -750,28 +750,17 @@ static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
     ram = memory_region_get_ram_ptr(mr) + section->offset_within_region +
           (section->offset_within_address_space - start_addr);
 
-    while (1) {
-        mem = kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(kml, start_addr, start_addr + size);
+    mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
+    if (!add) {
         if (!mem) {
-            break;
-        }
-
-        if (add && start_addr >= mem->start_addr &&
-            (start_addr + size <= mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size) &&
-            (ram - start_addr == mem->ram - mem->start_addr)) {
-            /* The new slot fits into the existing one and comes with
-             * identical parameters - update flags and done. */
-            kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, mr);
+            g_assert(!memory_region_is_ram(mr) && !writeable && !mr->romd_mode);
             return;
         }
-
-        old = *mem;
-
         if (mem->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) {
             kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(kml, section);
         }
 
-        /* unregister the overlapping slot */
+        /* unregister the slot */
         mem->memory_size = 0;
         err = kvm_set_user_memory_region(kml, mem);
         if (err) {
@@ -779,57 +768,21 @@ static void kvm_set_phys_mem(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
                     __func__, strerror(-err));
             abort();
         }
-
-        /* register prefix slot */
-        if (old.start_addr < start_addr) {
-            mem = kvm_alloc_slot(kml);
-            mem->memory_size = start_addr - old.start_addr;
-            mem->start_addr = old.start_addr;
-            mem->ram = old.ram;
-            mem->flags =  kvm_mem_flags(mr);
-
-            err = kvm_set_user_memory_region(kml, mem);
-            if (err) {
-                fprintf(stderr, "%s: error registering prefix slot: %s\n",
-                        __func__, strerror(-err));
-#ifdef TARGET_PPC
-                fprintf(stderr, "%s: This is probably because your kernel's " \
-                                "PAGE_SIZE is too big. Please try to use 4k " \
-                                "PAGE_SIZE!\n", __func__);
-#endif
-                abort();
-            }
-        }
-
-        /* register suffix slot */
-        if (old.start_addr + old.memory_size > start_addr + size) {
-            ram_addr_t size_delta;
-
-            mem = kvm_alloc_slot(kml);
-            mem->start_addr = start_addr + size;
-            size_delta = mem->start_addr - old.start_addr;
-            mem->memory_size = old.memory_size - size_delta;
-            mem->ram = old.ram + size_delta;
-            mem->flags = kvm_mem_flags(mr);
-
-            err = kvm_set_user_memory_region(kml, mem);
-            if (err) {
-                fprintf(stderr, "%s: error registering suffix slot: %s\n",
-                        __func__, strerror(-err));
-                abort();
-            }
-        }
+        return;
     }
 
-    if (!add) {
+    if (mem) {
+        /* update the slot */
+        kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, mr);
         return;
     }
+
+    /* register the new slot */
     mem = kvm_alloc_slot(kml);
     mem->memory_size = size;
     mem->start_addr = start_addr;
     mem->ram = ram;
     mem->flags = kvm_mem_flags(mr);
-
     err = kvm_set_user_memory_region(kml, mem);
     if (err) {
         fprintf(stderr, "%s: error registering slot: %s\n", __func__,
-- 
2.9.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/6] kvm: kvm_log_start/stop are only called with known sections
  2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/6] kvm: we never have overlapping slots in kvm_set_phys_mem() David Hildenbrand
@ 2017-08-09 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/6] kvm: kvm_log_sync() is only called with known memory sections David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling Paolo Bonzini
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2017-08-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm, david

Let's properly align the sections first and bail out if we would ever
be called with a memory region we don't know yet.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index 7b45506..78a7f01 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -411,15 +411,21 @@ static int kvm_slot_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml, KVMSlot *mem,
 static int kvm_section_update_flags(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
                                     MemoryRegionSection *section)
 {
-    hwaddr phys_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
-    ram_addr_t size = int128_get64(section->size);
-    KVMSlot *mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, phys_addr, size);
+    hwaddr start_addr, size;
+    KVMSlot *mem;
 
-    if (mem == NULL)  {
+    size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
+    if (!size) {
         return 0;
-    } else {
-        return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
     }
+
+    mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
+    if (!mem) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
+        abort();
+    }
+
+    return kvm_slot_update_flags(kml, mem, section->mr);
 }
 
 static void kvm_log_start(MemoryListener *listener,
-- 
2.9.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/6] kvm: kvm_log_sync() is only called with known memory sections
  2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/6] kvm: kvm_log_start/stop are only called with known sections David Hildenbrand
@ 2017-08-09 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
  2017-08-09 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling Paolo Bonzini
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2017-08-09 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm, david

Flatview will make sure that we can only end up in this function with
memory sections that correspond to exactly one slot. So we don't
have to iterate multiple times. There won't be overlapping slots but
only matching slots.

Properly align the section and look up the corresponding slot. This
heavily simplifies this function.

We can now get rid of kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot().

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index 78a7f01..5f1463d 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -218,34 +218,6 @@ static hwaddr kvm_align_section(MemoryRegionSection *section,
     return size;
 }
 
-/*
- * Find overlapping slot with lowest start address
- */
-static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
-                                            hwaddr start_addr,
-                                            hwaddr end_addr)
-{
-    KVMState *s = kvm_state;
-    KVMSlot *found = NULL;
-    int i;
-
-    for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
-        KVMSlot *mem = &kml->slots[i];
-
-        if (mem->memory_size == 0 ||
-            (found && found->start_addr < mem->start_addr)) {
-            continue;
-        }
-
-        if (end_addr > mem->start_addr &&
-            start_addr < mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size) {
-            found = mem;
-        }
-    }
-
-    return found;
-}
-
 int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram,
                                        hwaddr *phys_addr)
 {
@@ -489,55 +461,48 @@ static int kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(KVMMemoryListener *kml,
                                           MemoryRegionSection *section)
 {
     KVMState *s = kvm_state;
-    unsigned long size, allocated_size = 0;
     struct kvm_dirty_log d = {};
     KVMSlot *mem;
-    int ret = 0;
-    hwaddr start_addr = section->offset_within_address_space;
-    hwaddr end_addr = start_addr + int128_get64(section->size);
+    hwaddr start_addr, size;
 
-    d.dirty_bitmap = NULL;
-    while (start_addr < end_addr) {
-        mem = kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(kml, start_addr, end_addr);
-        if (mem == NULL) {
-            break;
-        }
+    size = kvm_align_section(section, &start_addr);
+    if (!size) {
+        return 0;
+    }
 
-        /* XXX bad kernel interface alert
-         * For dirty bitmap, kernel allocates array of size aligned to
-         * bits-per-long.  But for case when the kernel is 64bits and
-         * the userspace is 32bits, userspace can't align to the same
-         * bits-per-long, since sizeof(long) is different between kernel
-         * and user space.  This way, userspace will provide buffer which
-         * may be 4 bytes less than the kernel will use, resulting in
-         * userspace memory corruption (which is not detectable by valgrind
-         * too, in most cases).
-         * So for now, let's align to 64 instead of HOST_LONG_BITS here, in
-         * a hope that sizeof(long) won't become >8 any time soon.
-         */
-        size = ALIGN(((mem->memory_size) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
-                     /*HOST_LONG_BITS*/ 64) / 8;
-        if (!d.dirty_bitmap) {
-            d.dirty_bitmap = g_malloc(size);
-        } else if (size > allocated_size) {
-            d.dirty_bitmap = g_realloc(d.dirty_bitmap, size);
-        }
-        allocated_size = size;
-        memset(d.dirty_bitmap, 0, allocated_size);
+    mem = kvm_lookup_matching_slot(kml, start_addr, size);
+    if (!mem) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "%s: error finding slot\n", __func__);
+        abort();
+    }
 
-        d.slot = mem->slot | (kml->as_id << 16);
-        if (kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d) == -1) {
-            DPRINTF("ioctl failed %d\n", errno);
-            ret = -1;
-            break;
-        }
+    /* XXX bad kernel interface alert
+     * For dirty bitmap, kernel allocates array of size aligned to
+     * bits-per-long.  But for case when the kernel is 64bits and
+     * the userspace is 32bits, userspace can't align to the same
+     * bits-per-long, since sizeof(long) is different between kernel
+     * and user space.  This way, userspace will provide buffer which
+     * may be 4 bytes less than the kernel will use, resulting in
+     * userspace memory corruption (which is not detectable by valgrind
+     * too, in most cases).
+     * So for now, let's align to 64 instead of HOST_LONG_BITS here, in
+     * a hope that sizeof(long) won't become >8 any time soon.
+     */
+    size = ALIGN(((mem->memory_size) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
+                 /*HOST_LONG_BITS*/ 64) / 8;
+    d.dirty_bitmap = g_malloc0(size);
 
-        kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(section, d.dirty_bitmap);
-        start_addr = mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size;
+    d.slot = mem->slot | (kml->as_id << 16);
+    if (kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d) == -1) {
+        DPRINTF("ioctl failed %d\n", errno);
+        g_free(d.dirty_bitmap);
+        return -1;
     }
+
+    kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(section, d.dirty_bitmap);
     g_free(d.dirty_bitmap);
 
-    return ret;
+    return 0;
 }
 
 static void kvm_coalesce_mmio_region(MemoryListener *listener,
-- 
2.9.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling
  2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/6] kvm: kvm_log_sync() is only called with known memory sections David Hildenbrand
@ 2017-08-09 16:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2017-08-09 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Hildenbrand, qemu-devel; +Cc: kvm

On 09/08/2017 15:33, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> If I am not missing something important here, we can heavily simplify
> the kvm_slot code. Flatview will make sure that we don't have to deal
> with overlapping slots. E.g. when a memory section is resized, we are
> first notified about the removal and then about the new memory section.
> 
> So basically, we can directly always map one memory section to one
> kvm slot (if the fixed up size is > 0).
> 
> Only very briefly tested. Will do some more testing if we agree that this
> is the right thing to do.

Yes, it all looks very sane.

Paolo

> David Hildenbrand (6):
>   kvm: require JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS
>   kvm: factor out alignment of memory section
>   kvm: use start + size for memory ranges
>   kvm: we never have overlapping slots in kvm_set_phys_mem()
>   kvm: kvm_log_start/stop are only called with known sections
>   kvm: kvm_log_sync() is only called with known memory sections
> 
>  accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 276 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 89 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-09 16:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-08-09 13:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling David Hildenbrand
2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/6] kvm: require JOIN_MEMORY_REGIONS_WORKS David Hildenbrand
2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/6] kvm: factor out alignment of memory section David Hildenbrand
2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/6] kvm: use start + size for memory ranges David Hildenbrand
2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/6] kvm: we never have overlapping slots in kvm_set_phys_mem() David Hildenbrand
2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/6] kvm: kvm_log_start/stop are only called with known sections David Hildenbrand
2017-08-09 13:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/6] kvm: kvm_log_sync() is only called with known memory sections David Hildenbrand
2017-08-09 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] QEMU: kvm: cleanup kvm_slot handling Paolo Bonzini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).