From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhiyong.wu@ucloud.cn,
"Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [for-2.10 PATCH v2] 9pfs: local: fix fchmodat_nofollow() limitations
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:06:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170809180617.1ea5c101@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1ae9a24-632b-1dde-631a-b11a3e968ab7@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1295 bytes --]
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:59:46 -0500
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 10:22 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>> The solution is to use O_PATH: openat() now succeeds in both cases, and we
> >>> can ensure the path isn't a symlink with fstat(). The associated entry in
> >>> "/proc/self/fd" can hence be safely passed to the regular chmod() syscall.
> >>
> >> Hey - should we point this out as a viable solution to the glibc folks,
> >> since their current user-space emulation of AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW is broken?
> >>
> >
> > Probably. What's the best way to do that ?
>
> I've added a comment to
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14578; you'll also want
> to point to the lkml discussion in that bug. And reading that bug, it
> also looks like your hack with /proc/self/fd has been proposed by Rich
> Felker since 2013! (although fstat() didn't work until Linux 3.6, even
> though O_PATH predates that time) - so there is that one additional
> concern of whether we need to cater to the window of kernels where
> O_PATH exists but fstat() on that fd can't learn whether we opened a
> symlink.
>
BTW, what happens with fstat() and O_PATH before Linux 3.6 ? Does it
fail or does it return something wrong in th stat buf ?
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-09 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-09 14:23 [Qemu-devel] [for-2.10 PATCH v2] 9pfs: local: fix fchmodat_nofollow() limitations Greg Kurz
2017-08-09 14:55 ` Eric Blake
2017-08-09 15:01 ` Eric Blake
2017-08-09 15:23 ` Greg Kurz
2017-08-09 15:22 ` Greg Kurz
2017-08-09 15:59 ` Eric Blake
2017-08-09 16:06 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2017-08-09 15:11 ` Michael Tokarev
2017-08-09 15:28 ` Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170809180617.1ea5c101@bahia.lan \
--to=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=zhiyong.wu@ucloud.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).