From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/1] Fix "make clean" for s390 target
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:32:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170815103221.2446bc3d.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86e21c68-93ee-0311-643d-dde2c8589eea@redhat.com>
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:26:18 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15.08.2017 10:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 15.08.2017 09:03, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:02:10 +0200
> >> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 14.08.2017 22:44, Eric Farman wrote:
> >>>> How often does one really do a "make clean" ? Rather infrequently,
> >>>> as I only stumbled on this today.
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps I have missed the RM variable somewhere, as I see similar syntax
> >>>> in some of the tests/tcg/ Makefiles, but I don't see it being set here.
> >>>> My configure statement isn't terribly interesting, just enabling debug
> >>>> for an s390x target, and as such there's no RM variable in its output.
> >>>> I'll trust that Thomas will chime in with where it should have been.
> >>>> In the meantime, this does the trick for me.
> >>>
> >>> RM is one of the variables that should be pre-initialized by Make, and
> >>> AFAIK should be used to increase portability (well, it's likely not
> >>> important for QEMU since we require a posix-shell like built environment
> >>> anyway).
> >>>
> >>> According to the info page of Make, chapter "10.3 Variables Used by
> >>> Implicit Rules":
> >>>
> >>> `RM'
> >>> Command to remove a file; default `rm -f'.
> >>>
> >>> I've also checked it again and "make clean" works fine here (using GNU
> >>> Make 3.82). Which version of Make (and Linux distro) are you using?
> >>
> >> Interesting. It fails for me with GNU Make 3.82 on my RHEL guest as
> >> well.
> >>
> >>> Anyway, maybe I also simply missed something, so I'm certainly also fine
> >>> with the patch to revert it to "rm -f".
> >>
> >> Given that other bios makefiles use rm -f as well, let's just change
> >> back until we figure out what's wrong.
> >
> > I just discovered that it fails for me as well when I do "make clean"
> > from the top directory. So far I was only doing "make clean" after doing
> > a "cd pc-bios/s390-ccw" first, and that works fine. Weird. Something
> > seems to unset the RM variable in our build system, but I fail to find
> > the spot where this happens...
>
> Ok, just found it: It's this line in rules.mak:
>
> MAKEFLAGS += -rR
>
> The parameter -R disables the built-in variables, so RM can indeed not
> work here. Sorry, I wasn't aware of that setting yet, so your patch is
> indeed the right fix here (or we should maybe define RM in rules.mak, too).
The other users are all in tests/tcg/.
Would there be value in using the built-in variables generally? (Well,
value that outweighs having to go through the qemu build system...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-14 20:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/1] Fix "make clean" for s390 target Eric Farman
2017-08-14 20:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use rm command during make clean Eric Farman
2017-08-15 7:23 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-15 5:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/1] Fix "make clean" for s390 target Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 7:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-15 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 8:26 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 8:32 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-08-15 8:39 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-15 10:27 ` Eric Farman
2017-08-15 10:00 ` Peter Maydell
2017-08-15 11:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-15 11:10 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170815103221.2446bc3d.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).