From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhZh1-0004wO-Cm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:07:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhZgw-0000dM-Kz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:07:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dhZgw-0000aj-Eq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 07:07:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:07:16 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170815130716.296f031c.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20170814204450.24118-1-farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 0/1] Fix "make clean" for s390 target List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Eric Farman , Thomas Huth , Christian Borntraeger , Alexander Graf , QEMU Developers On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 11:00:51 +0100 Peter Maydell wrote: > On 14 August 2017 at 21:44, Eric Farman wrote: > > How often does one really do a "make clean" ? Rather infrequently, > > as I only stumbled on this today. > > FWIW, one of my standard pre-merge build tests does a > "make clean" and then a make (mostly as a check that we > do build from clean as well as incrementally). Not sure > why it didn't catch this... Probably because you don't build on s390x... I'll add it to my workflow, though.