From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42017) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1diKYL-0003cQ-N1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:09:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1diKYG-0006KJ-UD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:09:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1diKYG-0006Jm-Nb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:09:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:09:25 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170817150925.3ff3babd.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8511f043-aafb-77b4-cce4-9290451d25a9@redhat.com> References: <20170817092225.4264-1-david@redhat.com> <20170817092225.4264-11-david@redhat.com> <8511f043-aafb-77b4-cce4-9290451d25a9@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.11 10/10] target/s390x: cleanup cpu.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, rth@twiddle.net, Aurelien Jarno , borntraeger@de.ibm.com On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:41:34 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 17.08.2017 11:22, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > Let's reshuffle the function prototypes so we get a cleaner outline > > of the files. > >=20 > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > > --- > > target/s390x/cpu.h | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------= -------- > > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) =20 >=20 > Not sure whether this code churn here is really worth the effort ... I'd > prefer to introduce file-specific headers for the prototypes instead, > e.g. helper.h, mmu_helper.h, etc. ... but that's just my 0.02 =E2=82=AC .= .. I > also won't object if this patch gets included as is. I'll stare a bit more at it to decide whether this is worthwile...