Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 for-2.11 08/18] target/s390x: move gtod_*() declarations to s390-virtio.h

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:05:12 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 21.08.2017 12:08, Cornelia Huck wrote:

> > In s390-virtio.c, the only thing used outside of s390-virtio-ccw.c is
> > s390_cpuaddr2state(), and the only place that uses it for something
> > other than getting a dummy cpu is the kvm sigp target code. Can we
> > replace that last usage with a different construct?  
> 
> As CPUs are stored in s390-virtio.c (S390CPU **cpu_states) this is not
> possible. We could only get access to cpu #x via qom /machine/cpu[#x],
> but I guess that won't have best performance :)
> 
> We could move that definition into the machine state (which would make
> sense, as the cpus belong to a machine).

The machine state looks like a better place than s390-virtio.c.

> 
> > 
> > In s390-virtio.h, the s390_register_virtio_hypercall() interface is the
> > only thing that still makes sense to be exported.
> >   
> 
> Anyhow, I would prefer to have these cleanups in a separate series.
> Nevertheless they make perfect sense.

This is certainly material for a different series :) Just thought I'd
write down what I noticed.