From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djy3h-0008J5-1l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:32:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djy3e-00055b-GN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:32:43 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([2401:3900:2:1::2]:34945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djy3e-000534-3W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:32:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:09:17 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20170822010917.GO12356@umbus.fritz.box> References: <20170816082650.21880-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <223c4e3c-097f-5a91-37fa-df4bfb427d60@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aTCJOP0qgkSGqHWA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] boot-serial-test: prefer tcg accelerator List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Laurent Vivier , Thomas Huth , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Cornelia Huck , Richard Henderson , QEMU Developers --aTCJOP0qgkSGqHWA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 16 August 2017 at 11:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 16/08/2017 10:26, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> Prefer to use the tcg accelarator if it is available: This is our only > >> real smoke test for tcg, and fast enough to use it for that. > > > > I'm not sure this is required for 2.10. Yes, it means the coverage from > > "make check" is worse, but that's it. >=20 > Yes, I'd put it under "if we need to roll an rc4 anyway for > some more significant bug we might as well put this in too, > but it doesn't merit cutting rc4 by itself." It does entirely break "make check" on a ppc host. And that in turn has held up my testing cycle for a couple of ppc regressions from 2.9 that I was hoping to squeeze in. Does that change your calculations? --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --aTCJOP0qgkSGqHWA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEdfRlhq5hpmzETofcbDjKyiDZs5IFAlmbhDoACgkQbDjKyiDZ s5IwvxAAzTM65I5W48yNBlJB/RjMQpdaII4xXt/27qtQ482WWTYYE7m4uOamFS6/ 6GH7AO6EvSyZGw1i9Q3YpbgMCtGcNLAMoMQk15o3WZ17Nnjxp2Gxi6ebA0u/f/pt jC4W8rmhYBtkDXx5QL5JV99WO4L4b9sFUwbBFZDQFU3Kr9g+yFlUGUJPqaGNC4Fs +9BZn0VGhVC8KShpWhOPlyJgU2KysrDLahVxn1F6pKPf2JQMp9JtSdQDJZNDwCuL LoZ7xGdO2I7RmJ0vB/gWkGgeB+rjlH3lFy9K9l6D8/hra0e0FGQ5frOICX7jcgK4 BuoGtwqraB3agf68OBTan5Zg7i0vZ6AUG4MR05LyCkVTlQ6k93S/928bZcuhc4Og 1UPY/SVkJkmtggQCAweU8VrTWOUANLHCjX+O8WULkm5aewyw9RPdAr1Ajep8w4Ri B/U4HZi0m/lEh3LebGavXpWsh8pFAq8hjvuL1xAdVglP971I7eLqgvG08EVs+wvs ihRBPer/DCjTPaa3bemXbKXb+hXqa72pj+b3hk+mFF6EiPbSL4pOGdiZw9jQD2y6 vP9bPomoF1stGm0lQ/Gow0ZZJjgcy8D+wgX1aF0u0PwjgZmyxVGXQ4PCRp43RuOO /TQFvlKAMMHJYqPpyZ5cDCRIRG17BSLumCcx5sAB9552FP8WsCQ= =k+cd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aTCJOP0qgkSGqHWA--