From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkPuQ-0007Al-Np for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 03:17:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkPuM-0005nB-2P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 03:17:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkPuL-0005mp-Rt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 03:16:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 09:16:50 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170823091650.48e7c44e.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170823002907.GC5379@umbus.fritz.box> References: <20170816082650.21880-1-cohuck@redhat.com> <223c4e3c-097f-5a91-37fa-df4bfb427d60@redhat.com> <20170822010917.GO12356@umbus.fritz.box> <3f0dc918-0f55-e2f4-bf47-fe4abf5453bb@redhat.com> <20170822112046.GC12356@umbus.fritz.box> <20170822134815.77020eb8.cohuck@redhat.com> <20170823002907.GC5379@umbus.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] boot-serial-test: prefer tcg accelerator List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: Peter Maydell , Laurent Vivier , Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Huth , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , QEMU Developers On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:29:07 +1000 David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 01:48:15PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 21:20:46 +1000 > > David Gibson wrote: > > > > > Obviously it's not a thing to fix right now, but I've really been > > > thinking that none of the tests should use this "TCG or KVM" stuff. > > > They should instead be run with *both* options - or at least the ones > > > that are available on the host. > > > > Having one test as a 'smoke test' that is run for everything available > > sounds like a good idea, and the boot-serial test may be a good > > candidate for that. > > > > I would not want to run every test with every accelerator, however, as > > this makes 'make check' even slower than it is now. (Although it may be > > useful to be able to trigger 'run everything' tests on some dedicated > > test machines.) > > I'd be fine with only running the full matrix on a "make check-harder" > or whatever, target. But I'd like the option to be there. Sometimes > (like when preparing a pull request) a slower check is an acceptable > cost for better coverage. make check with one smoke test + make check-harder (like the name :) sounds like a good combination.