From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
To: alex.bennee@linaro.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>,
"open list:All patches CC here" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 PATCH 2/5] cpus-common: Cache allocated work items
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 02:33:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170829063313.10237-2-bobby.prani@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170829063313.10237-1-bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Using heaptrack, I found that quite a few of our temporary allocations
are coming from allocating work items. Instead of doing this
continously, we can cache the allocated items and reuse them instead
of freeing them.
Stats from an ARM64 guest (boot+shutdown):
heaptrack stats(before):
allocations: 1471317
leaked allocations: 73824
temporary allocations: 651293
heaptrack stats(after):
allocations: 1143130
leaked allocations: 73693
temporary allocations: 487342
The improvement in speedup is minor and within error margins, however I think the
patch is still worth. We can also explore atomics instead of taking a lock for
the work item pool.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
cpus-common.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpus-common.c b/cpus-common.c
index 59f751ecf9..ccf5f50e4e 100644
--- a/cpus-common.c
+++ b/cpus-common.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
static QemuMutex qemu_cpu_list_lock;
+static QemuMutex qemu_wi_pool_lock;
static QemuCond exclusive_cond;
static QemuCond exclusive_resume;
static QemuCond qemu_work_cond;
@@ -33,6 +34,49 @@ static QemuCond qemu_work_cond;
*/
static int pending_cpus;
+typedef struct qemu_work_item {
+ struct qemu_work_item *next;
+ run_on_cpu_func func;
+ run_on_cpu_data data;
+ bool free, exclusive, done;
+} qemu_work_item;
+
+typedef struct qemu_wi_pool {
+ qemu_work_item *head;
+ int num_items;
+} qemu_wi_pool;
+
+qemu_wi_pool *wi_free_pool;
+
+static void qemu_init_workitem_pool(void)
+{
+ wi_free_pool = g_malloc0(sizeof(qemu_wi_pool));
+}
+
+static void qemu_wi_pool_insert(qemu_work_item *item)
+{
+ qemu_mutex_lock(&qemu_wi_pool_lock);
+ qemu_work_item *curr = atomic_read(&wi_free_pool->head);
+ item->next = curr;
+ wi_free_pool->head = item;
+ qemu_mutex_unlock(&qemu_wi_pool_lock);
+}
+
+static qemu_work_item *qemu_wi_pool_remove(void)
+{
+ qemu_mutex_lock(&qemu_wi_pool_lock);
+ qemu_work_item *curr = atomic_read(&wi_free_pool->head);
+ if (curr == NULL) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+ wi_free_pool->head = curr->next;
+ curr->next = NULL;
+
+ out:
+ qemu_mutex_unlock(&qemu_wi_pool_lock);
+ return curr;
+}
+
void qemu_init_cpu_list(void)
{
/* This is needed because qemu_init_cpu_list is also called by the
@@ -43,6 +87,9 @@ void qemu_init_cpu_list(void)
qemu_cond_init(&exclusive_cond);
qemu_cond_init(&exclusive_resume);
qemu_cond_init(&qemu_work_cond);
+
+ qemu_init_workitem_pool();
+ qemu_mutex_init(&qemu_wi_pool_lock);
}
void cpu_list_lock(void)
@@ -106,14 +153,7 @@ void cpu_list_remove(CPUState *cpu)
qemu_mutex_unlock(&qemu_cpu_list_lock);
}
-struct qemu_work_item {
- struct qemu_work_item *next;
- run_on_cpu_func func;
- run_on_cpu_data data;
- bool free, exclusive, done;
-};
-
-static void queue_work_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, struct qemu_work_item *wi)
+static void queue_work_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, qemu_work_item *wi)
{
qemu_mutex_lock(&cpu->work_mutex);
if (cpu->queued_work_first == NULL) {
@@ -132,7 +172,7 @@ static void queue_work_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, struct qemu_work_item *wi)
void do_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data,
QemuMutex *mutex)
{
- struct qemu_work_item wi;
+ qemu_work_item wi;
if (qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu)) {
func(cpu, data);
@@ -156,9 +196,11 @@ void do_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data,
void async_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data)
{
- struct qemu_work_item *wi;
+ qemu_work_item *wi = qemu_wi_pool_remove();
- wi = g_malloc0(sizeof(struct qemu_work_item));
+ if (!wi) {
+ wi = g_malloc0(sizeof(qemu_work_item));
+ }
wi->func = func;
wi->data = data;
wi->free = true;
@@ -299,9 +341,11 @@ void cpu_exec_end(CPUState *cpu)
void async_safe_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func,
run_on_cpu_data data)
{
- struct qemu_work_item *wi;
+ qemu_work_item *wi = qemu_wi_pool_remove();
- wi = g_malloc0(sizeof(struct qemu_work_item));
+ if (!wi) {
+ wi = g_malloc0(sizeof(qemu_work_item));
+ }
wi->func = func;
wi->data = data;
wi->free = true;
@@ -312,7 +356,7 @@ void async_safe_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func,
void process_queued_cpu_work(CPUState *cpu)
{
- struct qemu_work_item *wi;
+ qemu_work_item *wi;
if (cpu->queued_work_first == NULL) {
return;
@@ -343,7 +387,8 @@ void process_queued_cpu_work(CPUState *cpu)
}
qemu_mutex_lock(&cpu->work_mutex);
if (wi->free) {
- g_free(wi);
+ memset(wi, 0, sizeof(qemu_work_item));
+ qemu_wi_pool_insert(wi);
} else {
atomic_mb_set(&wi->done, true);
}
--
2.13.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-29 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-29 6:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] target/arm: Remove stale comment Pranith Kumar
2017-08-29 6:33 ` Pranith Kumar [this message]
2017-09-05 12:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 PATCH 2/5] cpus-common: Cache allocated work items Alex Bennée
2017-08-29 6:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 PATCH 3/5] mttcg: Add tcg target default memory ordering Pranith Kumar
2017-08-29 14:51 ` Richard Henderson
2017-08-29 6:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 PATCH 4/5] mttcg: Implement implicit ordering semantics Pranith Kumar
2017-08-29 14:53 ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-02 1:44 ` Emilio G. Cota
2017-08-29 6:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 PATCH 5/5] tcg/softmmu: Increase size of TLB caches Pranith Kumar
2017-08-29 15:01 ` Richard Henderson
2017-08-29 16:23 ` Pranith Kumar
2017-08-29 15:03 ` Richard Henderson
2017-09-05 12:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] target/arm: Remove stale comment Alex Bennée
2017-09-06 0:35 ` Pranith Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170829063313.10237-2-bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--to=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=serge.fdrv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).