From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: changing ROM bundling in tar dists for releases
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:24:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170901092407.GE31680@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504254677.10150.3.camel@redhat.com>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:31:17AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > - The qemu release dists get ever larger as we add more ROMS.
> > > Adding
> > > EFI ROM builds for i386, x86_64, and aarch64 will make the dists
> > > larger still.
> >
> > I think these make sense. Should we tie this into the
> > recent suggestion (by Gerd?) that we should put all the
> > rom blobs into git submodules, and otherwise generally
> > try to regularise our handling of blobs?
>
> It surely makes sense to consider both together, so we can work out a
> reasonable workflow for firmware updates and distribution.
>
> I think it makes sense to create a separate project for the firmware
> blobs. Move over the firmware binaries and source submodules to the
> new project. This way updating both firmware sources and binaries can
> be done with a single commit, like we handle this today, just in the
> new firmware repo instead of the main qemu repo.
>
> When moving only the binaries to a separate git submodule and
> continuing to have the sources as main qemu repo submodules firmware
> updates become more complicated.
>
> > > 3. Change existing dist, and add a new one with bundled bits
> > >
> > > qemu-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2 - qemu source only
> > > qemu-addons-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2 - bundled ROMS + libs
>
> With the scheme above it makes sense to have a qemu-firmware-
> ${version}.tar.gz addon tarball. Maybe even two (one with the prebuilt
> binaries and one with the sources).
>
> Question is what to do with the non-firmware submodules (pixman, dtc,
> more?) then. I think they are not that big, so I doubt it is worth the
> hassle to create two tarball versions. And license-wise it isn't a
> issue too.
I've always wondered why we need to specialcase those modules at all.
Personally I'd just remove them entirely and let people install the
-dev packages on their distro just like they do for any other build
prerequisite of QEMU.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 12:29 [Qemu-devel] RFC: changing ROM bundling in tar dists for releases Daniel P. Berrange
2017-08-31 12:49 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-01 8:31 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-09-01 9:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2017-09-01 9:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-09-01 11:00 ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-01 14:11 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-09-01 15:13 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-09-01 17:45 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-08-31 15:47 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170901092407.GE31680@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).