From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnn1N-0005Gh-GR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:34:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnn1M-0004GX-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:34:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 15:33:48 +0100 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20170901143348.GP31680@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" References: <20170901105434.3288-1-berrange@redhat.com> <5fff868d-4d35-ec3f-cdd8-9b7363c4e6d3@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5fff868d-4d35-ec3f-cdd8-9b7363c4e6d3@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix / skip recent iotests with LUKS driver List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , Fam Zheng On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:26:30AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 09/01/2017 05:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Two recently added iotests are currently breaking 'check -luks', > > fix the easy one and disable the hard one. > > > > Daniel P. Berrange (2): > > iotests: rewrite 192 to use _launch_qemu to fix LUKS support > > iotests: blacklist 194 with the luks driver > > Since both tests involve an NBD server, I can take this series through > my NBD queue. Or, since both involve LUKS, you can push it in your next > crypto pull request. Any preferences? Best if either you or a block maintainer queue it i think Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|