From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] x86/acpi: build SRAT when memory hotplug is enabled
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:23:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170904092305.6adbf505@nial.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170901161118.GQ7570@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:11:18 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:45:42PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > Linux uses SRAT to determine the maximum memory in a system, which is
> > used to determine whether to use the swiotlb for IOMMU or not for a
> > device that supports only 32 bits of addresses.
>
> Do you have a pointer to the corresponding Linux code, for
> reference? Which SRAT entries Linux uses to make this decision?
ec941c5f x86/mm/64: Enable SWIOTLB if system has SRAT memory regions above MAX_DMA32_PFN
> > When there is no NUMA configuration, qemu will not build SRAT. And when
> > memory hotplug is done, some Linux device drivers start failing.
> >
> > Tested by running with -m 512M,slots=8,maxmem=1G, adding the memory,
> > putting that online and using the system. Without the patch, swiotlb is
> > not used and ATA driver fails. With the patch, swiotlb is used, no
> > driver failure is observed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
>
> As far as I can see, this will only add APIC entries and a memory
> affinity entry for the first 640KB (which would be obviously
> wrong) if pcms->numa_nodes is 0.
I think safest way to achieve what patch needs is to
enable add numa node implicitly if user hasn't done it explicitly on CLI
when memory hotplug is enabled i.e. slots != 0.
>
> Once we apply the "Fix SRAT memory building in case of node 0
> without RAM" patch from Dou Liyang, no memory affinity entries
> will be generated if pcms->numa_nodes is 0. Would this cause the
> problem to happen again?
>
>
> > ---
> > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > index 98dd424678..fb94249779 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > @@ -2645,6 +2645,9 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine)
> > GArray *tables_blob = tables->table_data;
> > AcpiSlicOem slic_oem = { .id = NULL, .table_id = NULL };
> > Object *vmgenid_dev;
> > + ram_addr_t hotplugabble_address_space_size =
> > + object_property_get_int(OBJECT(pcms), PC_MACHINE_MEMHP_REGION_SIZE,
> > + NULL);
> >
> > acpi_get_pm_info(&pm);
> > acpi_get_misc_info(&misc);
> > @@ -2708,7 +2711,7 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState *machine)
> > build_tpm2(tables_blob, tables->linker);
> > }
> > }
> > - if (pcms->numa_nodes) {
> > + if (pcms->numa_nodes || hotplugabble_address_space_size) {
> > acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> > build_srat(tables_blob, tables->linker, machine);
> > if (have_numa_distance) {
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-04 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-01 15:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] x86/acpi: build SRAT when memory hotplug is enabled Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2017-09-01 16:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-04 1:38 ` Dou Liyang
2017-09-04 13:08 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-05 1:17 ` Dou Liyang
2017-09-11 10:58 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-12 0:58 ` Dou Liyang
2017-09-04 7:23 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170904092305.6adbf505@nial.brq.redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).