Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] iotests: rewrite 192 to use _launch_qemu to fix LUKS support

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1245 bytes --]

Am 01.09.2017 um 16:22 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 09/01/2017 05:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The LUKS driver requires extra args to QEMU to setup passwords.
> > The _launch_qemu function takes care of this, so convert the
> > test to use this function and use correct -drive syntax
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/192 | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> >  
> > -{
> > -echo "nbd_server_start unix:$TEST_DIR/nbd"
> > -echo "nbd_server_add -w drive0"
> > -echo "q"
> > -} | $QEMU -nodefaults -display none -monitor stdio \
> > -    -drive format=$IMGFMT,file=$TEST_IMG,if=ide,id=drive0 \
> > -    -incoming defer 2>&1 | _filter_testdir | _filter_qemu | _filter_hmp
> 
> Can this test use QMP instead of HMP? But that's an independent question.

As far as I am concerned, there is nothing wrong with having HMP tests.
HMP commands already call QMP internally (except for the generic QMP
code path below the command handlers), so using HMP actually increases
the test coverage in most cases. We should try to have a good mix of
test cases using QMP and test cases using HMP.

Kevin

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]