From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: Move rdma libs to per object
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:12:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170907121216.GL30609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170907113742.GC25123@lemon.lan>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 07:37:42PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 09/07 10:37, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Fam Zheng (famz@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> >
> > OK, I've not actually got a preference as to whether it's
> > per-object or not - I don't really see any advantage.
>
> Thanks for the review. You're right this probably doesn't make a difference
> except for a bit more consistency, until we want to make rdma a module (as in
> --enable-modules) like the ones in block layer. The -libs and -cflags variables
> were initially added just for that.
>
> While we are talking about it, is there any reason why that will not be a good
> idea? There are other libraries used by QEMU outside block layer that are
> overdue to be converted to modules, like ui (gtk, sdl, etc.), rdma seems to be a
> candidate too.
Since we have per-module flags, it makes sense to use them whereever it is
reasonable todo so. The global flags should only be needed for things which
are truely globally used, which is (almost) only glib2.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-07 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-07 8:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] buildsys: Move rdma libs to per object Fam Zheng
2017-09-07 9:37 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-09-07 11:37 ` Fam Zheng
2017-09-07 11:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-09-07 12:12 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2017-09-07 9:46 ` Peter Xu
2017-09-07 11:55 ` Juan Quintela
2017-09-08 9:21 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170907121216.GL30609@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).