From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqCmU-0000bS-OW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 02:28:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqCmI-0000zt-B4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 02:28:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqCmI-0000zb-37 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 02:28:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E28285545 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 06:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 14:28:28 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170908062828.GE4511@lemon> References: <20170907082918.7299-1-famz@redhat.com> <1504776868.15653.6.camel@redhat.com> <20170907114329.GD25123@lemon.lan> <1504851615.13941.0.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1504851615.13941.0.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] buildsys: Move ui/usb library cflags/libs to per object List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 09/08 08:20, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 19:43 +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > > On Thu, 09/07 11:34, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 16:29 +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > > > > Hi Gerd, > > > > > > > > This is part two of the QEMU_CFLAGS and libs_softmmu cleanup > > > > series, > > > > including > > > > ui/, audio/ and hw/usb/. Please review. > > > > > > Looks good, survived a test build. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann > > > > Thanks for the quick review! Do you want to queue this in your tree? > > If not I > > can include it in my next pull request for "build and test > > automation" patches. > > Feel free do include it in your pull. I assumed that is your intention > anyway as you've asked for review not merge ;) Thanks, I'll send a pull request later. (I thought asking for review first is a necessary step before talking about merging :) Fam