From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
cohuck@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/21] s390x: move sclp_service_call() to sclp.h
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:52:24 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911175224.GP7570@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c758ae70-a664-d13a-dd24-768f71e3f2e4@redhat.com>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:23:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/09/2017 00:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 02:46:36PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 08.09.2017 06:21, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >>> On 07.09.2017 22:13, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>>> Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file.
> >>>> Fix up one include. Do a forward declaration of CPUS390XState to fix the
> >>>> two sclp consoles complaining.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 2 ++
> >>>> target/s390x/cpu.h | 1 -
> >>>> target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 1 +
> >>>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> >>>> index a72d096081..4b86a8a293 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> >>>> @@ -242,5 +242,7 @@ sclpMemoryHotplugDev *init_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
> >>>> sclpMemoryHotplugDev *get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
> >>>> void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb);
> >>>> void raise_irq_cpu_hotplug(void);
> >>>> +typedef struct CPUS390XState CPUS390XState;
> >>>> +int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
> >>>
> >>> That's dangerous and likely does not work with certain versions of GCC.
> >>> You can't do a "forward declaration" with typedef in C, I'm afraid. See
> >>> for example:
> >>>
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg01454.html
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-06/msg03337.html
> >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8367646/redefinition-of-typedef
> >>>
> >>> All this typedef'ing in QEMU is pretty bad ... we run into this problem
> >>> again and again. include/qemu/typedefs.h is just a work-around for this.
> >>> I know people like typedefs for some reasons (I used to do that, too,
> >>> before I realized the trouble with them), but IMHO we should rather
> >>> adopt the typedef-related rules from the kernel coding conventions instead:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.13/process/coding-style.html#typedefs
> >>>
> >>> Thomas
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, this is really nasty. And I wasn't aware of the involved issues.
> >>
> >> This seems to be the only feasible solution (including cpu.h sounds
> >> wrong and will require a bunch of other includes):
> >>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> >> index a72d096081..ce80915a02 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> >> @@ -242,5 +242,7 @@ sclpMemoryHotplugDev
> >> *init_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
> >> sclpMemoryHotplugDev *get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
> >> void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb);
> >> void raise_irq_cpu_hotplug(void);
> >> +struct CPUS390XState;
> >> +int sclp_service_call(struct CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
> >> uint32_t code);
> >>
> >> #endif
> >
> > Why not use typedefs.h?
>
> See Markus's reply. But, maybe it's even better to use S390CPU* and
> include target/s390x/cpu-qom.h, which by design provides as little
> definitions as needed.
I don't see an argument against moving typedef CPUS390XState to
typedefs.h in Markus' reply. I see one argument for it (reducing
the need for non-cyclic includes).
cpu-qom.h includes cpu.h, so I don't know why using S390CPU*
would solve any problem. I don't disagree about changing the
function to use S390CPU* eventually, but it would still require
us make a choice between: a) including the header where the
typedef name is declared (cpu.h or cpu-qom.h); or b) moving the
typedef name declaration to typedefs.h.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > index 4b86a8a293..3512bf8283 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
> > @@ -242,7 +242,6 @@ sclpMemoryHotplugDev *init_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
> > sclpMemoryHotplugDev *get_sclp_memory_hotplug_dev(void);
> > void sclp_service_interrupt(uint32_t sccb);
> > void raise_irq_cpu_hotplug(void);
> > -typedef struct CPUS390XState CPUS390XState;
> > int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
> >
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/include/qemu/typedefs.h b/include/qemu/typedefs.h
> > index 39bc8351a3..9c97bffa92 100644
> > --- a/include/qemu/typedefs.h
> > +++ b/include/qemu/typedefs.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ typedef struct Chardev Chardev;
> > typedef struct CompatProperty CompatProperty;
> > typedef struct CPUAddressSpace CPUAddressSpace;
> > typedef struct CPUState CPUState;
> > +typedef struct CPUS390XState CPUS390XState;
> > typedef struct DeviceListener DeviceListener;
> > typedef struct DeviceState DeviceState;
> > typedef struct DirtyBitmapSnapshot DirtyBitmapSnapshot;
> > diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> > index 032d1de2e8..f99a82cd5e 100644
> > --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> > @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ typedef struct MchkQueue {
> > uint16_t type;
> > } MchkQueue;
> >
> > -typedef struct CPUS390XState {
> > +struct CPUS390XState {
> > uint64_t regs[16]; /* GP registers */
> > /*
> > * The floating point registers are part of the vector registers.
> > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ typedef struct CPUS390XState {
> > /* currently processed sigp order */
> > uint8_t sigp_order;
> >
> > -} CPUS390XState;
> > +};
> >
> > static inline CPU_DoubleU *get_freg(CPUS390XState *cs, int nr)
> > {
> >
> >
> >
> >> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> >> index 3aa2e46aac..032d1de2e8 100644
> >> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> >> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> >> @@ -721,6 +721,5 @@ int s390_cpu_virt_mem_rw(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr laddr,
> >> uint8_t ar, void *hostbuf,
> >>
> >> /* outside of target/s390x/ */
> >> S390CPU *s390_cpu_addr2state(uint16_t cpu_addr);
> >> -int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code);
> >>
> >> #endif
> >> diff --git a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> >> index b142db71c6..8b07535b02 100644
> >> --- a/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> >> +++ b/target/s390x/misc_helper.c
> >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> >> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
> >> #include "hw/s390x/ebcdic.h"
> >> #include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-hcall.h"
> >> +#include "hw/s390x/sclp.h"
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> /* #define DEBUG_HELPER */
> >>
> >>
> >> Opinions?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> David
> >
>
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-07 20:13 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/21] s390x cleanups and CPU hotplug via device_add David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/21] exec, dump, i386, ppc, s390x: don't include exec/cpu-all.h explicitly David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/21] cpu: drop old comments describing members David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/21] s390x: get rid of s390-virtio.c David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/21] s390x: rename s390-virtio.h to s390-virtio-hcall.h David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/21] target/s390x: move typedef of S390CPU to its definition David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/21] s390x: move s390_virtio_hypercall() to s390-virtio-hcall.h David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/21] s390x: move subsystem_reset() to s390-virtio-ccw.h David Hildenbrand
2017-09-08 3:58 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-08 7:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/21] s390x: move sclp_service_call() to sclp.h David Hildenbrand
2017-09-08 4:21 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-08 12:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-09-11 2:19 ` Thomas Huth
2017-10-02 7:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-09-08 12:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-09 22:07 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-11 2:23 ` Thomas Huth
2017-09-11 18:22 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-11 10:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-09-11 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-11 17:52 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2017-09-11 17:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-11 18:06 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/21] target/s390x: use trigger_pgm_exception() in s390_cpu_handle_mmu_fault() David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/21] target/s390x: use program_interrupt() in per_check_exception() David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/21] s390x: allow only 1 CPU with TCG David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/21] target/s390x: set cpu->id for linux user when realizing David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/21] target/s390x: use "core-id" for cpu number/address/id handling David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 14/21] target/s390x: rename next_cpu_id to next_core_id David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/21] s390x: print CPU definitions in sorted order David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 16/21] s390x: allow cpu hotplug via device_add David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/21] s390x: CPU hot unplug via device_del cannot work for now David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 18/21] s390x: implement query-hotpluggable-cpus David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 19/21] s390x: get rid of cpu_s390x_create() David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/21] s390x: generate sclp cpu information from possible_cpus David Hildenbrand
2017-09-07 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 21/21] s390x: allow CPU hotplug in random core-id order David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170911175224.GP7570@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).