From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drbxK-0007hJ-PP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:33:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drbxH-0003vA-JE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:33:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drbxH-0003u6-DC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:33:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467985D5EB for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:33:33 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20170912033333.GA29091@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <20170911132627.9505-1-cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170911132627.9505-1-cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dump: do not dump non-existent guest memory List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lvivier@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:26:27PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > It does not really make sense to dump memory that is not there. >=20 > Moreover, that fixes a segmentation fault when calling dump-guest-memor= y > with no filter for a machine with no memory defined. >=20 > New behaviour is: >=20 > (qemu) dump-guest-memory /dev/null > dump: no guest memory to dump > (qemu) dump-guest-memory /dev/null 0 4096 > dump: no guest memory to dump >=20 > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck > --- >=20 > Another unmaintained file. Joy. cc:ing some more-or-less random folks. I thought Marc-Andr=C3=A9 had proposed to be the maintainer? But indeed I didn't see the line in maintainer file. Anyway, if anyone think I am ok to maintain this single file (considering that I haven't posted patches on it for 2 years, and I haven't been working on any kind of maintainer job), please let me know. I'm glad to start with it (or with Marc-Andr=C3=A9). Thanks, --=20 Peter Xu