From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ds9Tj-0001pT-6t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:21:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ds9Tg-0006Dp-33 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:21:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ds9Tf-0006Cx-TR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:21:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:21:15 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170913172115.1b7fb95d.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20170913132417.24384-1-david@redhat.com> <20170913132417.24384-9-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 08/22] s390x: move sclp_service_call() to sclp.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: David Hildenbrand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson , borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Alexander Graf , Eduardo Habkost , Matthew Rosato , Paolo Bonzini , Markus Armbruster , Igor Mammedov On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:29:23 +0200 Thomas Huth wrote: > On 13.09.2017 15:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file. > > Fix up one include. Do a forward declaration of struct CPUS390XState to > > fix the two sclp consoles complaining. > > Is that sentence about the forward declaration still valid? I did not > see that anymore here... Indeed. I can fix this up to: "Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file. Also adjust some includes." ? > > Apart from that: > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth