From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: enable kvm_pv_unhalt by default
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:09:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170914010947.GH7570@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170913143958.86385-1-agraf@suse.de>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 04:39:58PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Commit f010bc643a (target-i386: add feature kvm_pv_unhalt) introduced the
> kvm_pv_unhalt feature but didn't enable it by default.
>
> Without kvm_pv_unhalt we see a measurable degradation in scheduling
> performance, so enabling it by default does make sense IMHO. This patch
> just flips it to default to on by default.
>
> [With kvm_pv_unhalt disabled]
> $ perf bench sched messaging -l 10000
> Total time: 8.573 [sec]
>
> [With kvm_pv_unhalt enabled]
> $ perf bench sched messaging -l 10000
> Total time: 4.416 [sec]
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
>
> ---
>
> Let's ask everyone who was involved back then whether this is a feature
> that is good to enable by default. My measurements imply so, but who knows...
>
> Also, I'd kindly like to ask for guidance on how to make this reasonably
> well backwards compatible. I assume we only want to flip the default in newer
> machine models? If so, how?
There are two things that need to be taken care of:
* Guest ABI compatibility: if running an older machine-type, the
feature needs to remain disabled.
* machine-type runnability: libvirt doesn't expect an existing VM
to become not runnable on the same host if changing only the
machine-type. This can happen if the new machine-type enables
a feature that's not supported by the host kernel.
Guest ABI compatibility is relatively easy to handle: see how we
deal with kvm-pv-eoi on pc-1.2. Moving the machine-type-specific
kvm-defaults to PCMachineClass (instead of introducing new
pc_compat_*() functions) would be interesting, though; I will
take a look and try to implement that.
machine-type runnability is trickier: it's a problem in theory if
people can be running old kernels that didn't support the
feature, but may be not a problem in practice if the feature is
so old that everybody running a recent QEMU is also running a
recent enough kernel. In either case, the problem still needs to
be addressed somehow; just documenting the minimum kernel version
QEMU needs would probably be enough.
For reference, kvm_pv_unhalt was introduced in Linux v3.12-rc1.
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index 69676e13e1..c58f4ab24f 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -1581,6 +1581,7 @@ static PropValue kvm_default_props[] = {
> { "kvm-asyncpf", "on" },
> { "kvm-steal-time", "on" },
> { "kvm-pv-eoi", "on" },
> + { "kvm-pv-unhalt", "on" },
> { "kvmclock-stable-bit", "on" },
> { "x2apic", "on" },
> { "acpi", "off" },
> --
> 2.12.3
>
--
Eduardo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-14 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-13 14:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: enable kvm_pv_unhalt by default Alexander Graf
2017-09-14 1:09 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170914010947.GH7570@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).