From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, thuth@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/1] s390x: pci compat handling
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:14:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170915101406.27823-1-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
While playing around with compat machines a bit, I noticed that my
zpci detanglement patches broke migration from 2.7 to current master
(2.8 or newer are fine, which is why I did not notice that before.)
qemu 2.7 seems to create a savevm that a s390-next (or master) build
without the s390 phb chokes on:
qemu-system-s390x: Unknown savevm section or instance 'PCIBUS' 0
Creating the s390 phb for compat machines seems to cure this; still
RFC for the following reasons:
- I'm not sure what we're supposed to do on builds without pci. Fail
creating the compat machines? Do we need a new set of _NOPCI compat
machines for that?
- I don't understand why 2.7 fails, but 2.8 and later are fine. At
least, I was not able to spot which commit changed the behaviour
here... and I really want to understand this. Pointers welcome.
- I have not tested it extensively yet.
Patch is against s390-next.
Cornelia Huck (1):
s390x/ccw: create s390 phb for compat reasons as well
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 6 +++++-
include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.13.5
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-15 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-15 10:14 Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-09-15 10:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] s390x/ccw: create s390 phb for compat reasons as well Cornelia Huck
2017-09-15 11:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-15 13:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-15 13:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-15 13:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-15 13:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-09-15 14:16 ` Halil Pasic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170915101406.27823-1-cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zyimin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).