From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duHut-0000xK-Ar for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:46:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duHus-00087f-JB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:46:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:46:08 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20170919124608.GE3789@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170918185819.5984-1-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170918185819.5984-1-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jsnow@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org Am 18.09.2017 um 20:57 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, > but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the > reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even > much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of > converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity > rather than sectors. > > Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches. > > The overall conversion currently looks like: > part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged in 2.10, commit 51b0a488) > part 2: dirty-bitmap (this series, v7 was here [1]) > part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (v4 is posted [2] and is mostly reviewed) > part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [3], but needs review) I agree with Fam's comment on patch 5 and had a question on patch 18. Everything else is Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf