From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duJje-0000QG-FB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:42:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duJja-0006It-OM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:42:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:42:29 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20170919144229.GA18491@lemon> References: <20170918185819.5984-1-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170918185819.5984-1-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, jsnow@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org On Mon, 09/18 13:57, Eric Blake wrote: > There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS, > but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the > reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even > much higher levels). I've therefore started the task of > converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity > rather than sectors. > > Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches. > > The overall conversion currently looks like: > part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged in 2.10, commit 51b0a488) > part 2: dirty-bitmap (this series, v7 was here [1]) > part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (v4 is posted [2] and is mostly reviewed) > part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [3], but needs review) Patches 1-4, 6-20: Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng