From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duNrG-0006ZB-4x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:06:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duNrF-0000y6-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:06:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:06:34 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20170919190634.GK2107@work-vm> References: <20170710163029.129912-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20170710163029.129912-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20170711130650.GD2223@work-vm> <2394bb38-de82-8621-eeae-14ffea68869b@virtuozzo.com> <1078f013-e554-1d75-d1e8-f24daace5965@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1078f013-e554-1d75-d1e8-f24daace5965@virtuozzo.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ping Re: [PATCH v7 03/16] migration: split common postcopy out of ram postcopy List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Cc: John Snow , kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, famz@redhat.com, lirans@il.ibm.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com * Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (vsementsov@virtuozzo.com) wrote: > ping for 1-3 > Can we merge them? I see all of them have R-b's; so lets try and put them in the next migration merge. Quintela: Sound good? Dave > 22.08.2017 02:34, John Snow wrote: > > > > On 07/11/2017 09:38 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > > > 11.07.2017 16:06, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > > > * Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (vsementsov@virtuozzo.com) wrote: > > > > > Split common postcopy staff from ram postcopy staff. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > > > > I'm OK with this; I'm not sure I'd have bothered making the ping's > > > > dependent on it being RAM. > > > > > > > > (These first few are pretty much a separable series). > > > It would be grate if you (or Juan?) can take them separately. > > > > > Yes please. I don't think this ever happened, did it? Can we split off > > 1-3 and re-roll? > > > > -- > Best regards, > Vladimir > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK