From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] 390x/css: introduce maximum data address checking
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:43:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920134358.568404ac.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f526c43-6967-e30c-25c7-3b079e0598d3@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:34:21 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 10:06 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:27:44 +0200
> > Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The architecture mandates the addresses to be accessed on the first
> >> indirection level (that is, the data addresses without IDA, and the
> >> (M)IDAW addresses with (M)IDA) to be checked against an CCW format
> >> dependent limit maximum address. If a violation is detected, the storage
> >> access is not to be performed and a channel program check needs to be
> >> generated. As of today, we fail to do this check.
> >>
> >> Let us stick even closer to the architecture specification.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> hw/s390x/css.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >> include/hw/s390x/css.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/s390x/css.c b/hw/s390x/css.c
> >> index 6b0cd8861b..2d37a9ddde 100644
> >> --- a/hw/s390x/css.c
> >> +++ b/hw/s390x/css.c
> >> @@ -795,6 +795,11 @@ static inline int cds_check_len(CcwDataStream *cds, int len)
> >> return cds->flags & CDS_F_STREAM_BROKEN ? -EINVAL : len;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static inline bool cds_ccw_addrs_ok(hwaddr addr, int len, bool ccw_fmt1)
> >
> > cds_cda_limit_ok?
> >
>
> I use cda to point to the 2 level in case of IDA. This is about
> level 1 (addressed by the ccw directly). That's why I used ccw_addrs
> but if you think cds_cda_limit_ok is better I can live with that.
I don't care that much, tbh.
>
> We could also think about renaming cds->cda. Btw what does cda stand
> for (channel data address is my guess)?
Yes, cda should stand for 'channel data address'. Its usage in cds->cda
is probably the source of this minor confusion.
But, as said, I don't really care that much; so unless one of the other
folks has a strong opinion, feel free to leave as-is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 18:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] add CCW indirect data access support Halil Pasic
2017-09-19 18:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/5] s390x/css: introduce css data stream Halil Pasic
2017-09-20 6:44 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-09-19 18:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/5] s390x/css: use ccw " Halil Pasic
2017-09-21 9:40 ` Pierre Morel
2017-09-19 18:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/5] virtio-ccw: " Halil Pasic
2017-09-20 6:47 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-09-20 7:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-20 10:56 ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-20 10:57 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-21 9:44 ` Pierre Morel
2017-09-21 17:01 ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-19 18:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] 390x/css: introduce maximum data address checking Halil Pasic
2017-09-20 7:47 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-09-20 8:25 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-20 11:02 ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-21 0:39 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-09-20 8:06 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-20 11:34 ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-20 11:43 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2017-09-19 18:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] s390x/css: support ccw IDA Halil Pasic
2017-09-20 7:42 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-09-20 8:33 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-20 11:13 ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-20 11:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-20 16:46 ` Halil Pasic
2017-09-21 0:50 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-09-21 7:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-21 1:10 ` Dong Jia Shi
2017-09-20 8:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-09-20 11:01 ` Halil Pasic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170920134358.568404ac.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).