From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duy3C-0003xt-AA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 05:45:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duy38-0006ns-8Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 05:45:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duy38-0006ma-23 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 05:45:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:45:33 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170921114533.2d089e36.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <2bb5705f-eba3-2630-2e57-99242b9abd2a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170905111645.18068-1-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170905111645.18068-3-pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <2bb5705f-eba3-2630-2e57-99242b9abd2a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] s390x/css: use ccw data stream List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pierre Morel Cc: Halil Pasic , Dong Jia Shi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:33:03 +0200 Pierre Morel wrote: > On 05/09/2017 13:16, Halil Pasic wrote: > > Replace direct access which implicitly assumes no IDA > > or MIDA with the new ccw data stream interface which should > > cope with these transparently in the future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic > > --- > > hw/s390x/css.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/css.c b/hw/s390x/css.c > > index 87d913f81c..c1bc9944e6 100644 > > --- a/hw/s390x/css.c > > +++ b/hw/s390x/css.c > > @@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ static int css_interpret_ccw(SubchDev *sch, hwaddr ccw_addr, > > } > > > > /* Look at the command. */ > > + ccw_dstream_init(&sch->cds, &ccw, &(sch->orb)); > > switch (ccw.cmd_code) { > > case CCW_CMD_NOOP: > > /* Nothing to do. */ > > @@ -903,7 +904,7 @@ static int css_interpret_ccw(SubchDev *sch, hwaddr ccw_addr, > > } > > } > > len = MIN(ccw.count, sizeof(sch->sense_data)); > > - cpu_physical_memory_write(ccw.cda, sch->sense_data, len); > > + ccw_dstream_write_buf(&sch->cds, sch->sense_data, len); > > Don't you need to check the return value ? > > > sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - len; > > memset(sch->sense_data, 0, sizeof(sch->sense_data)); > > ret = 0; > > @@ -930,7 +931,7 @@ static int css_interpret_ccw(SubchDev *sch, hwaddr ccw_addr, > > } else { > > sense_id.reserved = 0; > > } > > - cpu_physical_memory_write(ccw.cda, &sense_id, len); > > + ccw_dstream_write_buf(&sch->cds, &sense_id, len); > > here too ? > > > sch->curr_status.scsw.count = ccw.count - len; > > ret = 0; > > break; > > > > I think Halil wanted to introduce error checking in a patch on top, to keep changes minimal for now (at least one of the patch submissions said so). It isn't worse than before, so putting it into a separate patch is fine by me.